Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes. / Browning, Martin; Crossley, Thomas.

Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 1996.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Browning, M & Crossley, T 1996 'Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes' Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

APA

Browning, M., & Crossley, T. (1996). Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

Vancouver

Browning M, Crossley T. Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. 1996.

Author

Browning, Martin ; Crossley, Thomas. / Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 1996.

Bibtex

@techreport{ca3334f0e9dd11dcbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes",
abstract = "We use a survey of unemployed people to examine how a job loss impacts on household expenditures. The principal focus is on the effect of the level of income replacement provided by Unemployment Insurance. We restrict attention to a sub-sample of respondents who are still in their first spell of unemployment after six months. For this group we find large consumption falls, averaging about 16% of total expenditure. The actual fall depends on a variety of factors of which the most important is the pre-job loss ratio of the respondent's income to household income. The effects of varying the replacement ratio are relatively small. We only find effects for those who did not have assets at the job loss and even for them the elasticity of total expenditure with respect to benefit is small. We conclude that for most of our sample, small changes in the benefit level will have no effect on living standards within the household and hence on other facets of behaviour such as job search, unemployment duration and the quality of any new job taken",
author = "Martin Browning and Thomas Crossley",
note = "JEL Classification: J65, D12",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes

AU - Browning, Martin

AU - Crossley, Thomas

N1 - JEL Classification: J65, D12

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - We use a survey of unemployed people to examine how a job loss impacts on household expenditures. The principal focus is on the effect of the level of income replacement provided by Unemployment Insurance. We restrict attention to a sub-sample of respondents who are still in their first spell of unemployment after six months. For this group we find large consumption falls, averaging about 16% of total expenditure. The actual fall depends on a variety of factors of which the most important is the pre-job loss ratio of the respondent's income to household income. The effects of varying the replacement ratio are relatively small. We only find effects for those who did not have assets at the job loss and even for them the elasticity of total expenditure with respect to benefit is small. We conclude that for most of our sample, small changes in the benefit level will have no effect on living standards within the household and hence on other facets of behaviour such as job search, unemployment duration and the quality of any new job taken

AB - We use a survey of unemployed people to examine how a job loss impacts on household expenditures. The principal focus is on the effect of the level of income replacement provided by Unemployment Insurance. We restrict attention to a sub-sample of respondents who are still in their first spell of unemployment after six months. For this group we find large consumption falls, averaging about 16% of total expenditure. The actual fall depends on a variety of factors of which the most important is the pre-job loss ratio of the respondent's income to household income. The effects of varying the replacement ratio are relatively small. We only find effects for those who did not have assets at the job loss and even for them the elasticity of total expenditure with respect to benefit is small. We conclude that for most of our sample, small changes in the benefit level will have no effect on living standards within the household and hence on other facets of behaviour such as job search, unemployment duration and the quality of any new job taken

M3 - Working paper

BT - Unemployment Insurance Benefit Levels and Consumption Changes

PB - Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 2999689