Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality. / Hvidberg, Kristoffer Balle; Kreiner, Claus Thustrup; Stantcheva, Stefanie.

I: The Review of Economic Studies, Bind 90, Nr. 6, 11.2023, s. 3083-3118.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hvidberg, KB, Kreiner, CT & Stantcheva, S 2023, 'Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality', The Review of Economic Studies, bind 90, nr. 6, s. 3083-3118. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad056, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad019

APA

Hvidberg, K. B., Kreiner, C. T., & Stantcheva, S. (2023). Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality. The Review of Economic Studies, 90(6), 3083-3118. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad056, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad019

Vancouver

Hvidberg KB, Kreiner CT, Stantcheva S. Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality. The Review of Economic Studies. 2023 nov.;90(6):3083-3118. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad056, https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad019

Author

Hvidberg, Kristoffer Balle ; Kreiner, Claus Thustrup ; Stantcheva, Stefanie. / Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality. I: The Review of Economic Studies. 2023 ; Bind 90, Nr. 6. s. 3083-3118.

Bibtex

@article{571ca93ff5cf475e89f675ad1e9bd6b2,
title = "Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality",
abstract = "We link survey data on Danish people{\textquoteright}s perceived income positions and fairness views on inequality within various reference groups to administrative records on their reference groups, income histories, and life events. People are, on average, well-informed about the income levels of their reference groups. Yet, lower-ranked respondents in all groups tend to overestimate their own position among others because they believe others{\textquoteright} incomes are lower than they actually are, whereas the opposite holds true for higher-ranked respondents. Misperceptions of positions in reference groups relate to proximity to other individuals, transparency norms, and visible signals of income. People view inequalities within their co-workers and education groups as significantly more unfair than overall inequality, yet underestimate inequality the most exactly within these groups. Views on the fairness of inequalities are strongly correlated with an individual{\textquoteright}s current position, move with shocks like unemployment or promotions, and change when experimentally informing people about their actual positions. However, the higher perceived unfairness of income differences within co-workers and education groups stays unchanged. The theoretical framework shows that this can have important implications for redistribution policy.",
author = "Hvidberg, {Kristoffer Balle} and Kreiner, {Claus Thustrup} and Stefanie Stantcheva",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad056",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "3083--3118",
journal = "Review of Economic Studies",
issn = "0034-6527",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality

AU - Hvidberg, Kristoffer Balle

AU - Kreiner, Claus Thustrup

AU - Stantcheva, Stefanie

PY - 2023/11

Y1 - 2023/11

N2 - We link survey data on Danish people’s perceived income positions and fairness views on inequality within various reference groups to administrative records on their reference groups, income histories, and life events. People are, on average, well-informed about the income levels of their reference groups. Yet, lower-ranked respondents in all groups tend to overestimate their own position among others because they believe others’ incomes are lower than they actually are, whereas the opposite holds true for higher-ranked respondents. Misperceptions of positions in reference groups relate to proximity to other individuals, transparency norms, and visible signals of income. People view inequalities within their co-workers and education groups as significantly more unfair than overall inequality, yet underestimate inequality the most exactly within these groups. Views on the fairness of inequalities are strongly correlated with an individual’s current position, move with shocks like unemployment or promotions, and change when experimentally informing people about their actual positions. However, the higher perceived unfairness of income differences within co-workers and education groups stays unchanged. The theoretical framework shows that this can have important implications for redistribution policy.

AB - We link survey data on Danish people’s perceived income positions and fairness views on inequality within various reference groups to administrative records on their reference groups, income histories, and life events. People are, on average, well-informed about the income levels of their reference groups. Yet, lower-ranked respondents in all groups tend to overestimate their own position among others because they believe others’ incomes are lower than they actually are, whereas the opposite holds true for higher-ranked respondents. Misperceptions of positions in reference groups relate to proximity to other individuals, transparency norms, and visible signals of income. People view inequalities within their co-workers and education groups as significantly more unfair than overall inequality, yet underestimate inequality the most exactly within these groups. Views on the fairness of inequalities are strongly correlated with an individual’s current position, move with shocks like unemployment or promotions, and change when experimentally informing people about their actual positions. However, the higher perceived unfairness of income differences within co-workers and education groups stays unchanged. The theoretical framework shows that this can have important implications for redistribution policy.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad056

DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad056

M3 - Journal article

VL - 90

SP - 3083

EP - 3118

JO - Review of Economic Studies

JF - Review of Economic Studies

SN - 0034-6527

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 372714971