Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade: British free trade in a microcosm of Empire?

Publikation: Working paper › Forskning

Standard

Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade : British free trade in a microcosm of Empire? / Sharp, Paul Richard.

Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2010.

Publikation: Working paper › Forskning

Harvard

Sharp, PR 2010 'Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade: British free trade in a microcosm of Empire?' Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

APA

Sharp, P. R. (2010). Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade: British free trade in a microcosm of Empire? Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

Vancouver

Sharp PR. Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade: British free trade in a microcosm of Empire? Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. 2010.

Author

Sharp, Paul Richard. / Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade : British free trade in a microcosm of Empire?. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2010.

Bibtex

@techreport{bf7ccf20010b11df825d000ea68e967b,
title = "Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade: British free trade in a microcosm of Empire?",
abstract = "It is often assumed that Britain's colonies followed the British doctrine of free trade in the second half of the nineteenth century. Malta, which became a British colony in 1814, did indeed become an early free trader. However, she failed to liberalize the grain trade, even when the mother country famously repealed the Corn Laws. This paper documents that although institutions changed over the years, the ad valorem equivalents of the duties on wheat did not. The reason for this seems to be that administrators were convinced that is was not possible to fund government spending in any other way. The duties on grain in Malta were therefore not protectionist, but rather for revenue purposes, in contrast to the UK Corn Laws. Taxing an inelastic demand for foreign wheat by Maltese, who were unable to grow enough food to support themselves, was certainly an effective way of raising revenue, but probably not the fairest one, as contemporaries were well aware.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Malta, wheat, trade policy, British Empire",
author = "Sharp, {Paul Richard}",
note = "JEL classification: N4, N5, N7",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade

T2 - British free trade in a microcosm of Empire?

AU - Sharp, Paul Richard

N1 - JEL classification: N4, N5, N7

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - It is often assumed that Britain's colonies followed the British doctrine of free trade in the second half of the nineteenth century. Malta, which became a British colony in 1814, did indeed become an early free trader. However, she failed to liberalize the grain trade, even when the mother country famously repealed the Corn Laws. This paper documents that although institutions changed over the years, the ad valorem equivalents of the duties on wheat did not. The reason for this seems to be that administrators were convinced that is was not possible to fund government spending in any other way. The duties on grain in Malta were therefore not protectionist, but rather for revenue purposes, in contrast to the UK Corn Laws. Taxing an inelastic demand for foreign wheat by Maltese, who were unable to grow enough food to support themselves, was certainly an effective way of raising revenue, but probably not the fairest one, as contemporaries were well aware.

AB - It is often assumed that Britain's colonies followed the British doctrine of free trade in the second half of the nineteenth century. Malta, which became a British colony in 1814, did indeed become an early free trader. However, she failed to liberalize the grain trade, even when the mother country famously repealed the Corn Laws. This paper documents that although institutions changed over the years, the ad valorem equivalents of the duties on wheat did not. The reason for this seems to be that administrators were convinced that is was not possible to fund government spending in any other way. The duties on grain in Malta were therefore not protectionist, but rather for revenue purposes, in contrast to the UK Corn Laws. Taxing an inelastic demand for foreign wheat by Maltese, who were unable to grow enough food to support themselves, was certainly an effective way of raising revenue, but probably not the fairest one, as contemporaries were well aware.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Malta

KW - wheat

KW - trade policy

KW - British Empire

M3 - Working paper

BT - Malta and the Nineteenth Century Grain Trade

PB - Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 16975885