Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms: new insights and a new approach

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms : new insights and a new approach. / Jakobsen, Katrine Marie Tofthøj; Søgaard, Jakob Egholt.

2020.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Jakobsen, KMT & Søgaard, JE 2020 'Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms: new insights and a new approach'. <https://www.econ.ku.dk/cebi/publikationer/working-papers/CEBI_WP_23-20.pdf>

APA

Jakobsen, K. M. T., & Søgaard, J. E. (2020). Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms: new insights and a new approach. CEBI Working Paper Series Nr. 23/20 https://www.econ.ku.dk/cebi/publikationer/working-papers/CEBI_WP_23-20.pdf

Vancouver

Jakobsen KMT, Søgaard JE. Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms: new insights and a new approach. 2020.

Author

Jakobsen, Katrine Marie Tofthøj ; Søgaard, Jakob Egholt. / Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms : new insights and a new approach. 2020. (CEBI Working Paper Series; Nr. 23/20).

Bibtex

@techreport{2d5304c4e71446d58df0ee6a63d92fb5,
title = "Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms: new insights and a new approach",
abstract = "We revisit the identification of behavioral responses to tax reforms and develop anew approach that allows for graphical validation of identifying assumptions and rep-resentation of treatment effects. Considering typical tax reforms, such as a reductionin the top income tax, we show that the state-of-the-art estimation strategy relies onan assumption that trend differences in income across the income distribution remainconstant in the absence of reforms. Similar to the pre-trend validation of differences-in-differences studies, this identifying assumption of constant trend differentials canbe validated by comparing the evolution of income in untreated parts of the incomedistribution over time. We illustrate the importance of our new validation approachby studying a number of tax reforms in Denmark, and we show how violations ofthe identifying assumption may drive the estimates obtained from the state-of-the-artstrategy.",
author = "Jakobsen, {Katrine Marie Tofth{\o}j} and S{\o}gaard, {Jakob Egholt}",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
series = "CEBI Working Paper Series",
number = "23/20",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms

T2 - new insights and a new approach

AU - Jakobsen, Katrine Marie Tofthøj

AU - Søgaard, Jakob Egholt

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - We revisit the identification of behavioral responses to tax reforms and develop anew approach that allows for graphical validation of identifying assumptions and rep-resentation of treatment effects. Considering typical tax reforms, such as a reductionin the top income tax, we show that the state-of-the-art estimation strategy relies onan assumption that trend differences in income across the income distribution remainconstant in the absence of reforms. Similar to the pre-trend validation of differences-in-differences studies, this identifying assumption of constant trend differentials canbe validated by comparing the evolution of income in untreated parts of the incomedistribution over time. We illustrate the importance of our new validation approachby studying a number of tax reforms in Denmark, and we show how violations ofthe identifying assumption may drive the estimates obtained from the state-of-the-artstrategy.

AB - We revisit the identification of behavioral responses to tax reforms and develop anew approach that allows for graphical validation of identifying assumptions and rep-resentation of treatment effects. Considering typical tax reforms, such as a reductionin the top income tax, we show that the state-of-the-art estimation strategy relies onan assumption that trend differences in income across the income distribution remainconstant in the absence of reforms. Similar to the pre-trend validation of differences-in-differences studies, this identifying assumption of constant trend differentials canbe validated by comparing the evolution of income in untreated parts of the incomedistribution over time. We illustrate the importance of our new validation approachby studying a number of tax reforms in Denmark, and we show how violations ofthe identifying assumption may drive the estimates obtained from the state-of-the-artstrategy.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - CEBI Working Paper Series

BT - Identifying behavioral responses to tax reforms

ER -

ID: 248805831