Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture. / Weisdorf, Jacob Louis.

I: European Review of Economic History, Bind 13, Nr. 2, 2009, s. 157-172.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Weisdorf, JL 2009, 'Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture', European Review of Economic History, bind 13, nr. 2, s. 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136149160900241X

APA

Weisdorf, J. L. (2009). Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture. European Review of Economic History, 13(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136149160900241X

Vancouver

Weisdorf JL. Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture. European Review of Economic History. 2009;13(2):157-172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136149160900241X

Author

Weisdorf, Jacob Louis. / Why did the First Farmers Toil? Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture. I: European Review of Economic History. 2009 ; Bind 13, Nr. 2. s. 157-172.

Bibtex

@article{08a31480f49611ddbf70000ea68e967b,
title = "Why did the First Farmers Toil?: Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture",
abstract = "Time-budget studies done among contemporary primitive people suggest that the first farmers worked harder to attain subsistence than their foraging predecessors. This makes the adoption of agriculture in the Stone Age one of the major curiosities in human cultural history. Theories offered by economists and economic historians largely fail to capture work-intensification among early farmers. Attributing a key role to human metabolism, this study provides a simple framework for analysing the adoption of agriculture. It demonstrates how the additional output that farming offered could have lured people into agriculture, but that subsequent population increase would eventually have swallowed up its benefits, forcing early farmers into an irreversible trap, where they had to do more work to attain subsistence compared to their foraging ancestors. The framework draws attention to the fact that, if agriculture arose out of need, as some scholars have suggested, then this was because prehistoric foragers turned down agriculture in the first place. Estimates of population growth before and after farming, however, in the light of the present framework seem to suggest that hunters were pulled rather than pushed into agriculture.",
author = "Weisdorf, {Jacob Louis}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1017/S136149160900241X",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "157--172",
journal = "European Review of Economic History",
issn = "1361-4916",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why did the First Farmers Toil?

T2 - Human Metabolism and the Origins of Agriculture

AU - Weisdorf, Jacob Louis

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Time-budget studies done among contemporary primitive people suggest that the first farmers worked harder to attain subsistence than their foraging predecessors. This makes the adoption of agriculture in the Stone Age one of the major curiosities in human cultural history. Theories offered by economists and economic historians largely fail to capture work-intensification among early farmers. Attributing a key role to human metabolism, this study provides a simple framework for analysing the adoption of agriculture. It demonstrates how the additional output that farming offered could have lured people into agriculture, but that subsequent population increase would eventually have swallowed up its benefits, forcing early farmers into an irreversible trap, where they had to do more work to attain subsistence compared to their foraging ancestors. The framework draws attention to the fact that, if agriculture arose out of need, as some scholars have suggested, then this was because prehistoric foragers turned down agriculture in the first place. Estimates of population growth before and after farming, however, in the light of the present framework seem to suggest that hunters were pulled rather than pushed into agriculture.

AB - Time-budget studies done among contemporary primitive people suggest that the first farmers worked harder to attain subsistence than their foraging predecessors. This makes the adoption of agriculture in the Stone Age one of the major curiosities in human cultural history. Theories offered by economists and economic historians largely fail to capture work-intensification among early farmers. Attributing a key role to human metabolism, this study provides a simple framework for analysing the adoption of agriculture. It demonstrates how the additional output that farming offered could have lured people into agriculture, but that subsequent population increase would eventually have swallowed up its benefits, forcing early farmers into an irreversible trap, where they had to do more work to attain subsistence compared to their foraging ancestors. The framework draws attention to the fact that, if agriculture arose out of need, as some scholars have suggested, then this was because prehistoric foragers turned down agriculture in the first place. Estimates of population growth before and after farming, however, in the light of the present framework seem to suggest that hunters were pulled rather than pushed into agriculture.

U2 - 10.1017/S136149160900241X

DO - 10.1017/S136149160900241X

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 157

EP - 172

JO - European Review of Economic History

JF - European Review of Economic History

SN - 1361-4916

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 10163893