Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence. / Rauchdobler, Julian; Sausgruber, Rupert; Tyran, Jean-Robert.

2009.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Rauchdobler, J, Sausgruber, R & Tyran, J-R 2009 'Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence'. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1529270

APA

Rauchdobler, J., Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J-R. (2009). Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence. Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper Nr. 09-27 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1529270

Vancouver

Rauchdobler J, Sausgruber R, Tyran J-R. Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence. 2009 dec. 29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1529270

Author

Rauchdobler, Julian ; Sausgruber, Rupert ; Tyran, Jean-Robert. / Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence. 2009. (Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper; Nr. 09-27).

Bibtex

@techreport{00c503a0fa8e40b9822b06ca96668902,
title = "Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence",
abstract = "Introducing a threshold in the sense of a minimal project size transforms a public goods game with an inefficient equilibrium into a coordination game with a set of Pareto-superior equilibria. Thresholds may therefore improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. In our one-shot experiment, we find that coordination often fails and exogenously imposed thresholds are ineffective at best and often counter-productive. This holds under a range of threshold levels and refund rates. We test if thresholds perform better if they are endogenously chosen, i.e. if a threshold is approved in a referendum, because voting may facilitate coordination due to signaling and commitment effects. We find that voting does have signaling and commitment effects but they are not strong enough to significantly improve the efficiency of thresholds.",
keywords = "provision of public goods, threshold, voting, experiments",
author = "Julian Rauchdobler and Rupert Sausgruber and Jean-Robert Tyran",
year = "2009",
month = dec,
day = "29",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.1529270",
language = "English",
series = "Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper",
number = "09-27",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence

AU - Rauchdobler, Julian

AU - Sausgruber, Rupert

AU - Tyran, Jean-Robert

PY - 2009/12/29

Y1 - 2009/12/29

N2 - Introducing a threshold in the sense of a minimal project size transforms a public goods game with an inefficient equilibrium into a coordination game with a set of Pareto-superior equilibria. Thresholds may therefore improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. In our one-shot experiment, we find that coordination often fails and exogenously imposed thresholds are ineffective at best and often counter-productive. This holds under a range of threshold levels and refund rates. We test if thresholds perform better if they are endogenously chosen, i.e. if a threshold is approved in a referendum, because voting may facilitate coordination due to signaling and commitment effects. We find that voting does have signaling and commitment effects but they are not strong enough to significantly improve the efficiency of thresholds.

AB - Introducing a threshold in the sense of a minimal project size transforms a public goods game with an inefficient equilibrium into a coordination game with a set of Pareto-superior equilibria. Thresholds may therefore improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. In our one-shot experiment, we find that coordination often fails and exogenously imposed thresholds are ineffective at best and often counter-productive. This holds under a range of threshold levels and refund rates. We test if thresholds perform better if they are endogenously chosen, i.e. if a threshold is approved in a referendum, because voting may facilitate coordination due to signaling and commitment effects. We find that voting does have signaling and commitment effects but they are not strong enough to significantly improve the efficiency of thresholds.

KW - provision of public goods

KW - threshold

KW - voting

KW - experiments

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.1529270

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.1529270

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper

BT - Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence

ER -

ID: 241647380