Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement : Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation. / Hansson, Nicolaj C; Thuesen, Leif; Hjortdal, Vibeke E; Leipsic, Jonathon; Andersen, Henning R; Poulsen, Steen H; Webb, John G; Christiansen, Evald H; Rasmussen, Lars E; Krusell, Lars R; Terp, Kim; Klaaborg, Kaj E; Tang, Mariann; Lassen, Jens F; Bøtker, Hans E; Nørgaard, Bjarne L.

I: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Bind 82, Nr. 6, 15.11.2013, s. 977-86.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hansson, NC, Thuesen, L, Hjortdal, VE, Leipsic, J, Andersen, HR, Poulsen, SH, Webb, JG, Christiansen, EH, Rasmussen, LE, Krusell, LR, Terp, K, Klaaborg, KE, Tang, M, Lassen, JF, Bøtker, HE & Nørgaard, BL 2013, 'Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation', Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, bind 82, nr. 6, s. 977-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25005

APA

Hansson, N. C., Thuesen, L., Hjortdal, V. E., Leipsic, J., Andersen, H. R., Poulsen, S. H., Webb, J. G., Christiansen, E. H., Rasmussen, L. E., Krusell, L. R., Terp, K., Klaaborg, K. E., Tang, M., Lassen, J. F., Bøtker, H. E., & Nørgaard, B. L. (2013). Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 82(6), 977-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25005

Vancouver

Hansson NC, Thuesen L, Hjortdal VE, Leipsic J, Andersen HR, Poulsen SH o.a. Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2013 nov. 15;82(6):977-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25005

Author

Hansson, Nicolaj C ; Thuesen, Leif ; Hjortdal, Vibeke E ; Leipsic, Jonathon ; Andersen, Henning R ; Poulsen, Steen H ; Webb, John G ; Christiansen, Evald H ; Rasmussen, Lars E ; Krusell, Lars R ; Terp, Kim ; Klaaborg, Kaj E ; Tang, Mariann ; Lassen, Jens F ; Bøtker, Hans E ; Nørgaard, Bjarne L. / Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement : Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation. I: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2013 ; Bind 82, Nr. 6. s. 977-86.

Bibtex

@article{5c43e9c069c5418aaf930ce5439df47b,
title = "Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the influence of aortic annular assessment with either multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) or conventional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) on the incidence of postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) was evaluated.BACKGROUND: PAR remains a major limitation in TAVR. Appropriate selection of transcatheter heart valve (THV) size is crucial to prevent PAR.METHODS: Outcomes following TAVR with a balloon-expandable THV were compared in two retrospective cohorts identified according to whether THV size selection was based on TEE (study group 1, n = 80) or MDCT (study group 2, n = 58).RESULTS: The two study groups were comparable with regard to baseline clinical, risk score, and echocardiographic characteristics. The incidence of moderate/severe PAR was lower in study group 2 than in group 1, 8.6% versus 28.8% (P < 0.01). The difference between the THV nominal diameter and MDCT annular diameter was predictive of moderate/severe PAR (AUC 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.92). Neither age, gender, body mass index, annular eccentricity index, aortic valve calcification nor the difference between the THV diameter and the TEE annular diameter predicted postprocedural PAR. Increased THV oversizing relative to the MDCT mean annular diameter was associated with reduced severity of PAR. No difference in perprocedural complications between two study groups was observed.CONCLUSION: MDCT-based annular sizing in TAVR significantly reduces postprocedural PAR, and THV oversizing appears pivotal in this aspect. Further delineation of the optimal degree of THV oversizing is needed.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging, Aortic Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology, Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging, Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects, Denmark/epidemiology, Echocardiography, Transesophageal, Female, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects, Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Incidence, Male, Multidetector Computed Tomography, Predictive Value of Tests, Prosthesis Design, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Hansson, {Nicolaj C} and Leif Thuesen and Hjortdal, {Vibeke E} and Jonathon Leipsic and Andersen, {Henning R} and Poulsen, {Steen H} and Webb, {John G} and Christiansen, {Evald H} and Rasmussen, {Lars E} and Krusell, {Lars R} and Kim Terp and Klaaborg, {Kaj E} and Mariann Tang and Lassen, {Jens F} and B{\o}tker, {Hans E} and N{\o}rgaard, {Bjarne L}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2013",
month = nov,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/ccd.25005",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "977--86",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement

T2 - Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation

AU - Hansson, Nicolaj C

AU - Thuesen, Leif

AU - Hjortdal, Vibeke E

AU - Leipsic, Jonathon

AU - Andersen, Henning R

AU - Poulsen, Steen H

AU - Webb, John G

AU - Christiansen, Evald H

AU - Rasmussen, Lars E

AU - Krusell, Lars R

AU - Terp, Kim

AU - Klaaborg, Kaj E

AU - Tang, Mariann

AU - Lassen, Jens F

AU - Bøtker, Hans E

AU - Nørgaard, Bjarne L

N1 - Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2013/11/15

Y1 - 2013/11/15

N2 - OBJECTIVES: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the influence of aortic annular assessment with either multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) or conventional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) on the incidence of postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) was evaluated.BACKGROUND: PAR remains a major limitation in TAVR. Appropriate selection of transcatheter heart valve (THV) size is crucial to prevent PAR.METHODS: Outcomes following TAVR with a balloon-expandable THV were compared in two retrospective cohorts identified according to whether THV size selection was based on TEE (study group 1, n = 80) or MDCT (study group 2, n = 58).RESULTS: The two study groups were comparable with regard to baseline clinical, risk score, and echocardiographic characteristics. The incidence of moderate/severe PAR was lower in study group 2 than in group 1, 8.6% versus 28.8% (P < 0.01). The difference between the THV nominal diameter and MDCT annular diameter was predictive of moderate/severe PAR (AUC 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.92). Neither age, gender, body mass index, annular eccentricity index, aortic valve calcification nor the difference between the THV diameter and the TEE annular diameter predicted postprocedural PAR. Increased THV oversizing relative to the MDCT mean annular diameter was associated with reduced severity of PAR. No difference in perprocedural complications between two study groups was observed.CONCLUSION: MDCT-based annular sizing in TAVR significantly reduces postprocedural PAR, and THV oversizing appears pivotal in this aspect. Further delineation of the optimal degree of THV oversizing is needed.

AB - OBJECTIVES: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the influence of aortic annular assessment with either multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) or conventional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) on the incidence of postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) was evaluated.BACKGROUND: PAR remains a major limitation in TAVR. Appropriate selection of transcatheter heart valve (THV) size is crucial to prevent PAR.METHODS: Outcomes following TAVR with a balloon-expandable THV were compared in two retrospective cohorts identified according to whether THV size selection was based on TEE (study group 1, n = 80) or MDCT (study group 2, n = 58).RESULTS: The two study groups were comparable with regard to baseline clinical, risk score, and echocardiographic characteristics. The incidence of moderate/severe PAR was lower in study group 2 than in group 1, 8.6% versus 28.8% (P < 0.01). The difference between the THV nominal diameter and MDCT annular diameter was predictive of moderate/severe PAR (AUC 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.92). Neither age, gender, body mass index, annular eccentricity index, aortic valve calcification nor the difference between the THV diameter and the TEE annular diameter predicted postprocedural PAR. Increased THV oversizing relative to the MDCT mean annular diameter was associated with reduced severity of PAR. No difference in perprocedural complications between two study groups was observed.CONCLUSION: MDCT-based annular sizing in TAVR significantly reduces postprocedural PAR, and THV oversizing appears pivotal in this aspect. Further delineation of the optimal degree of THV oversizing is needed.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging

KW - Aortic Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology

KW - Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging

KW - Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects

KW - Denmark/epidemiology

KW - Echocardiography, Transesophageal

KW - Female

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects

KW - Humans

KW - Imaging, Three-Dimensional

KW - Incidence

KW - Male

KW - Multidetector Computed Tomography

KW - Predictive Value of Tests

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1002/ccd.25005

DO - 10.1002/ccd.25005

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23703899

VL - 82

SP - 977

EP - 986

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 242612979