She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence. / Alnamlah, Manar; Gravert, Christina Annette.

2020.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Alnamlah, M & Gravert, CA 2020 'She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence'. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3714720

APA

Alnamlah, M., & Gravert, C. A. (2020). She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence. CEBI Working Paper Series Nr. 25/20 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3714720

Vancouver

Alnamlah M, Gravert CA. She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence. 2020 dec. 15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3714720

Author

Alnamlah, Manar ; Gravert, Christina Annette. / She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence. 2020. (CEBI Working Paper Series; Nr. 25/20).

Bibtex

@techreport{6733db85099644329b36496c1acce707,
title = "She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence",
abstract = "In competitive and high-reward domains such as corporate leadership and entrepreneurship, women are not only underrepresented but they are also more likely to drop-out after failure. In this study, we conducted a laboratory experiment to investigate the influence of attributing failure to one of the three causal attributions - luck, effort, and ability - on the gender difference in competition persistence. Participants compete in a real effort task and then their success or failure is attributed to one of three causal attributions. We find significant gender differences in competition persistence when failure is attributed to a lack of ability, with women dropping out more. On the contrary, when suggested that failure was due to lack of luck, women{\textquoteright}s competition persistence after failure increases relative to men. We find no gender difference when failure is attributed to a lack of effort. Our findings have important implications for designing feedback mechanisms to reduce the gender gap in competitive domains. ",
keywords = "decision analysis, competition, gender gap, performance feedback, laboratory experiment, decision analysis, competition, gender gap, performance feedback, laboratory experiment",
author = "Manar Alnamlah and Gravert, {Christina Annette}",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "15",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.3714720",
language = "English",
series = "CEBI Working Paper Series",
number = "25/20",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence

AU - Alnamlah, Manar

AU - Gravert, Christina Annette

PY - 2020/12/15

Y1 - 2020/12/15

N2 - In competitive and high-reward domains such as corporate leadership and entrepreneurship, women are not only underrepresented but they are also more likely to drop-out after failure. In this study, we conducted a laboratory experiment to investigate the influence of attributing failure to one of the three causal attributions - luck, effort, and ability - on the gender difference in competition persistence. Participants compete in a real effort task and then their success or failure is attributed to one of three causal attributions. We find significant gender differences in competition persistence when failure is attributed to a lack of ability, with women dropping out more. On the contrary, when suggested that failure was due to lack of luck, women’s competition persistence after failure increases relative to men. We find no gender difference when failure is attributed to a lack of effort. Our findings have important implications for designing feedback mechanisms to reduce the gender gap in competitive domains.

AB - In competitive and high-reward domains such as corporate leadership and entrepreneurship, women are not only underrepresented but they are also more likely to drop-out after failure. In this study, we conducted a laboratory experiment to investigate the influence of attributing failure to one of the three causal attributions - luck, effort, and ability - on the gender difference in competition persistence. Participants compete in a real effort task and then their success or failure is attributed to one of three causal attributions. We find significant gender differences in competition persistence when failure is attributed to a lack of ability, with women dropping out more. On the contrary, when suggested that failure was due to lack of luck, women’s competition persistence after failure increases relative to men. We find no gender difference when failure is attributed to a lack of effort. Our findings have important implications for designing feedback mechanisms to reduce the gender gap in competitive domains.

KW - decision analysis

KW - competition

KW - gender gap

KW - performance feedback

KW - laboratory experiment

KW - decision analysis

KW - competition

KW - gender gap

KW - performance feedback

KW - laboratory experiment

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3714720

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3714720

M3 - Working paper

T3 - CEBI Working Paper Series

BT - She Could Not Agree More: The Role of Failure Attribution in Shaping the Gender Gap in Competition Persistence

ER -

ID: 254665285