Response to Professor Stephen Jenkins’ comments on the World Income Inequality Database (WIID)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Response to Professor Stephen Jenkins’ comments on the World Income Inequality Database (WIID). / Badgaiyan, Nina; Pirttilä, Jukka; Tarp, Finn.

I: The Journal of Economic Inequality, Bind 13, Nr. 4, 2015, s. 679-682.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Badgaiyan, N, Pirttilä, J & Tarp, F 2015, 'Response to Professor Stephen Jenkins’ comments on the World Income Inequality Database (WIID)', The Journal of Economic Inequality, bind 13, nr. 4, s. 679-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-015-9307-1

APA

Badgaiyan, N., Pirttilä, J., & Tarp, F. (2015). Response to Professor Stephen Jenkins’ comments on the World Income Inequality Database (WIID). The Journal of Economic Inequality, 13(4), 679-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-015-9307-1

Vancouver

Badgaiyan N, Pirttilä J, Tarp F. Response to Professor Stephen Jenkins’ comments on the World Income Inequality Database (WIID). The Journal of Economic Inequality. 2015;13(4):679-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-015-9307-1

Author

Badgaiyan, Nina ; Pirttilä, Jukka ; Tarp, Finn. / Response to Professor Stephen Jenkins’ comments on the World Income Inequality Database (WIID). I: The Journal of Economic Inequality. 2015 ; Bind 13, Nr. 4. s. 679-682.

Bibtex

@article{fa1cbdd83a0945d9aacf39e50f02d46b,
title = "Response to Professor Stephen Jenkins{\textquoteright} comments on the World Income Inequality Database (WIID)",
abstract = "Professor Stephen Jenkins (this issue) has conducted an extremely careful and insightful analysis of two datasets, WIID and SWIID. In this short response, we focus on his review of the WIID, maintained and published by UNU-WIDER in agreement with the World Bank. We wish to highlight at the outset that we are very grateful for Professor Jenkins{\textquoteright} expert advice and suggestions; and note that the WIID has over the past couple of years been developed in the direction recommended in the appraisal. This response provides, first, some background to the development and basic philosophy of the WIID, with particular attention to data comparability and proper documentation. We subsequently outline the recent changes made to the database, now available on the internet as the revised version WIID3.0b.1 Finally, we offer some brief concluding remarks.",
author = "Nina Badgaiyan and Jukka Pirttil{\"a} and Finn Tarp",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s10888-015-9307-1",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "679--682",
journal = "Journal of Economic Inequality",
issn = "1569-1721",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Professor Stephen Jenkins’ comments on the World Income Inequality Database (WIID)

AU - Badgaiyan, Nina

AU - Pirttilä, Jukka

AU - Tarp, Finn

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Professor Stephen Jenkins (this issue) has conducted an extremely careful and insightful analysis of two datasets, WIID and SWIID. In this short response, we focus on his review of the WIID, maintained and published by UNU-WIDER in agreement with the World Bank. We wish to highlight at the outset that we are very grateful for Professor Jenkins’ expert advice and suggestions; and note that the WIID has over the past couple of years been developed in the direction recommended in the appraisal. This response provides, first, some background to the development and basic philosophy of the WIID, with particular attention to data comparability and proper documentation. We subsequently outline the recent changes made to the database, now available on the internet as the revised version WIID3.0b.1 Finally, we offer some brief concluding remarks.

AB - Professor Stephen Jenkins (this issue) has conducted an extremely careful and insightful analysis of two datasets, WIID and SWIID. In this short response, we focus on his review of the WIID, maintained and published by UNU-WIDER in agreement with the World Bank. We wish to highlight at the outset that we are very grateful for Professor Jenkins’ expert advice and suggestions; and note that the WIID has over the past couple of years been developed in the direction recommended in the appraisal. This response provides, first, some background to the development and basic philosophy of the WIID, with particular attention to data comparability and proper documentation. We subsequently outline the recent changes made to the database, now available on the internet as the revised version WIID3.0b.1 Finally, we offer some brief concluding remarks.

UR - https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jecinq/v13y2015i4p679-682.html

U2 - 10.1007/s10888-015-9307-1

DO - 10.1007/s10888-015-9307-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 679

EP - 682

JO - Journal of Economic Inequality

JF - Journal of Economic Inequality

SN - 1569-1721

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 146207555