Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes: An Experiment

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Standard

Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes: An Experiment. / Putterman, Louis G.; Tyran, Jean-Robert; Kamei, Kenju.

I: Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper, 13.01.2010.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskning

Harvard

Putterman, LG, Tyran, J-R & Kamei, K 2010, 'Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes: An Experiment', Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1535201

APA

Putterman, L. G., Tyran, J-R., & Kamei, K. (2010). Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes: An Experiment. Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1535201

Vancouver

Putterman LG, Tyran J-R, Kamei K. Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes: An Experiment. Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper. 2010 jan. 13. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1535201

Author

Putterman, Louis G. ; Tyran, Jean-Robert ; Kamei, Kenju. / Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes: An Experiment. I: Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper. 2010.

Bibtex

@article{895c694760064fe2a7fcae35eba552a1,
title = "Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes: An Experiment",
abstract = "The burgeoning literature on the use of sanctions to support public goods provision has largely neglected the use of formal or centralized sanctions. We let subjects playing a linear public goods game vote on the parameters of a formal sanction scheme capable both of resolving and of exacerbating the free-rider problem, depending on parameter settings. Most groups quickly learned to choose parameters inducing efficient outcomes. But despite uniform money payoffs implying common interest in those parameters, voting patterns suggest significant influence of cooperative orientation, political attitudes, and of gender and intelligence.",
keywords = "public good, voluntary contribution, formal sanction, experiment, penalty, voting",
author = "Putterman, {Louis G.} and Jean-Robert Tyran and Kenju Kamei",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
day = "13",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.1535201",
language = "English",
journal = "Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes: An Experiment

AU - Putterman, Louis G.

AU - Tyran, Jean-Robert

AU - Kamei, Kenju

PY - 2010/1/13

Y1 - 2010/1/13

N2 - The burgeoning literature on the use of sanctions to support public goods provision has largely neglected the use of formal or centralized sanctions. We let subjects playing a linear public goods game vote on the parameters of a formal sanction scheme capable both of resolving and of exacerbating the free-rider problem, depending on parameter settings. Most groups quickly learned to choose parameters inducing efficient outcomes. But despite uniform money payoffs implying common interest in those parameters, voting patterns suggest significant influence of cooperative orientation, political attitudes, and of gender and intelligence.

AB - The burgeoning literature on the use of sanctions to support public goods provision has largely neglected the use of formal or centralized sanctions. We let subjects playing a linear public goods game vote on the parameters of a formal sanction scheme capable both of resolving and of exacerbating the free-rider problem, depending on parameter settings. Most groups quickly learned to choose parameters inducing efficient outcomes. But despite uniform money payoffs implying common interest in those parameters, voting patterns suggest significant influence of cooperative orientation, political attitudes, and of gender and intelligence.

KW - public good

KW - voluntary contribution

KW - formal sanction

KW - experiment

KW - penalty

KW - voting

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.1535201

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.1535201

M3 - Journal article

JO - Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper

JF - Univ. of Copenhagen Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper

ER -

ID: 241647132