Addressing the Climate Problem: Choice between Allowances, Feed-in Tariffs and Taxes

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Addressing the Climate Problem : Choice between Allowances, Feed-in Tariffs and Taxes. / Amundsen, Eirik S.; Andersen, Peder; Mortensen, Jørgen Birk.

Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo, 2018.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Amundsen, ES, Andersen, P & Mortensen, JB 2018 'Addressing the Climate Problem: Choice between Allowances, Feed-in Tariffs and Taxes' Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo. <http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6926.pdf>

APA

Amundsen, E. S., Andersen, P., & Mortensen, J. B. (2018). Addressing the Climate Problem: Choice between Allowances, Feed-in Tariffs and Taxes. Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo. CESifo Working Papers Nr. 6926 http://www.cesifo-group.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp6926.pdf

Vancouver

Amundsen ES, Andersen P, Mortensen JB. Addressing the Climate Problem: Choice between Allowances, Feed-in Tariffs and Taxes. Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo. 2018.

Author

Amundsen, Eirik S. ; Andersen, Peder ; Mortensen, Jørgen Birk. / Addressing the Climate Problem : Choice between Allowances, Feed-in Tariffs and Taxes. Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo, 2018. (CESifo Working Papers; Nr. 6926).

Bibtex

@techreport{324d2c2feccb4c2ea28759521ccc053c,
title = "Addressing the Climate Problem: Choice between Allowances, Feed-in Tariffs and Taxes",
abstract = "Instruments chosen to pursue climate related targets are not always efficient. In this paper we consider an economy with three climate related targets for its electricity generation: a given share of “green” electricity, a given expansion of “green” electricity, and a given reduction of “black” (fossil based) electricity. At its disposal the country has three instruments: an allowance system (tradable green certificates), a subsidy system (feed-in tariffs) and a Pigouvian fossil tax. Each of these instruments may be used to attain any of the given targets. Within the setting of the model it is verified that each kind of the target has only a single efficient instrument under certainty, and that there is a deadweight loss of using other instruments to achieve the target. Similarly, there is also an analysis of instrument choice when several targets are to be attained at the same time. The paper also discusses the case of simultaneous targets as well as the relevanceof the various targets.",
author = "Amundsen, {Eirik S.} and Peder Andersen and Mortensen, {J{\o}rgen Birk}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
series = "CESifo Working Papers",
number = "6926",
publisher = "Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Addressing the Climate Problem

T2 - Choice between Allowances, Feed-in Tariffs and Taxes

AU - Amundsen, Eirik S.

AU - Andersen, Peder

AU - Mortensen, Jørgen Birk

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Instruments chosen to pursue climate related targets are not always efficient. In this paper we consider an economy with three climate related targets for its electricity generation: a given share of “green” electricity, a given expansion of “green” electricity, and a given reduction of “black” (fossil based) electricity. At its disposal the country has three instruments: an allowance system (tradable green certificates), a subsidy system (feed-in tariffs) and a Pigouvian fossil tax. Each of these instruments may be used to attain any of the given targets. Within the setting of the model it is verified that each kind of the target has only a single efficient instrument under certainty, and that there is a deadweight loss of using other instruments to achieve the target. Similarly, there is also an analysis of instrument choice when several targets are to be attained at the same time. The paper also discusses the case of simultaneous targets as well as the relevanceof the various targets.

AB - Instruments chosen to pursue climate related targets are not always efficient. In this paper we consider an economy with three climate related targets for its electricity generation: a given share of “green” electricity, a given expansion of “green” electricity, and a given reduction of “black” (fossil based) electricity. At its disposal the country has three instruments: an allowance system (tradable green certificates), a subsidy system (feed-in tariffs) and a Pigouvian fossil tax. Each of these instruments may be used to attain any of the given targets. Within the setting of the model it is verified that each kind of the target has only a single efficient instrument under certainty, and that there is a deadweight loss of using other instruments to achieve the target. Similarly, there is also an analysis of instrument choice when several targets are to be attained at the same time. The paper also discusses the case of simultaneous targets as well as the relevanceof the various targets.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - CESifo Working Papers

BT - Addressing the Climate Problem

PB - Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research ‐ CESifo

ER -

ID: 192514461