A cost-effectiveness analysis of fistula treatment in the abdominal region using a new integrated fistula and wound management system

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A cost-effectiveness analysis of fistula treatment in the abdominal region using a new integrated fistula and wound management system. / Keiding, Hans; Skovgaard, Rasmus.

I: Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (WOCN), Bind 35, Nr. 6, 2008, s. 592-595.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Keiding, H & Skovgaard, R 2008, 'A cost-effectiveness analysis of fistula treatment in the abdominal region using a new integrated fistula and wound management system', Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (WOCN), bind 35, nr. 6, s. 592-595.

APA

Keiding, H., & Skovgaard, R. (2008). A cost-effectiveness analysis of fistula treatment in the abdominal region using a new integrated fistula and wound management system. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (WOCN), 35(6), 592-595.

Vancouver

Keiding H, Skovgaard R. A cost-effectiveness analysis of fistula treatment in the abdominal region using a new integrated fistula and wound management system. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (WOCN). 2008;35(6):592-595.

Author

Keiding, Hans ; Skovgaard, Rasmus. / A cost-effectiveness analysis of fistula treatment in the abdominal region using a new integrated fistula and wound management system. I: Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (WOCN). 2008 ; Bind 35, Nr. 6. s. 592-595.

Bibtex

@article{63b6c9f0f38011ddbf70000ea68e967b,
title = "A cost-effectiveness analysis of fistula treatment in the abdominal region using a new integrated fistula and wound management system",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate wear time and costs of a new fistula and wound management system (FWMS) compared to standard fistula treatments.METHODS: Data were collected from 22 patients with an abdominal fistula recruited from 5 sites in the United States. This economic evaluation was based on a cost-effectiveness analysis with wear time, material costs, and labor costs taken into account.RESULTS: A longer wear time for each pouch as well as simpler handling by nurses amounted to an average lower cost of $83 per day of treatment with the FWMS. A large variation was observed in the collected data. However, the sensitivity analysis showed that 77% of patients achieved a cost reduction when changing to the FWMS.CONCLUSION: The FWMS was less costly than traditional methods for managing abdominal fistula, probably due to longer wear time and less time spent on each pouching session.",
author = "Hans Keiding and Rasmus Skovgaard",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "592--595",
journal = "Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing",
issn = "1071-5754",
publisher = "Wolters Kluwer N.V.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cost-effectiveness analysis of fistula treatment in the abdominal region using a new integrated fistula and wound management system

AU - Keiding, Hans

AU - Skovgaard, Rasmus

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate wear time and costs of a new fistula and wound management system (FWMS) compared to standard fistula treatments.METHODS: Data were collected from 22 patients with an abdominal fistula recruited from 5 sites in the United States. This economic evaluation was based on a cost-effectiveness analysis with wear time, material costs, and labor costs taken into account.RESULTS: A longer wear time for each pouch as well as simpler handling by nurses amounted to an average lower cost of $83 per day of treatment with the FWMS. A large variation was observed in the collected data. However, the sensitivity analysis showed that 77% of patients achieved a cost reduction when changing to the FWMS.CONCLUSION: The FWMS was less costly than traditional methods for managing abdominal fistula, probably due to longer wear time and less time spent on each pouching session.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate wear time and costs of a new fistula and wound management system (FWMS) compared to standard fistula treatments.METHODS: Data were collected from 22 patients with an abdominal fistula recruited from 5 sites in the United States. This economic evaluation was based on a cost-effectiveness analysis with wear time, material costs, and labor costs taken into account.RESULTS: A longer wear time for each pouch as well as simpler handling by nurses amounted to an average lower cost of $83 per day of treatment with the FWMS. A large variation was observed in the collected data. However, the sensitivity analysis showed that 77% of patients achieved a cost reduction when changing to the FWMS.CONCLUSION: The FWMS was less costly than traditional methods for managing abdominal fistula, probably due to longer wear time and less time spent on each pouching session.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 592

EP - 595

JO - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

JF - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

SN - 1071-5754

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 10154577