Who gets the Goods? A General Equilibrium Perspective on Food Aid in Mozambique

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Who gets the Goods? A General Equilibrium Perspective on Food Aid in Mozambique. / Tarp, Finn; Arndt, Channing.

I: Food Policy, Bind 26, Nr. 2, 2001, s. 107-119.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Tarp, F & Arndt, C 2001, 'Who gets the Goods? A General Equilibrium Perspective on Food Aid in Mozambique', Food Policy, bind 26, nr. 2, s. 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00040-3

APA

Tarp, F., & Arndt, C. (2001). Who gets the Goods? A General Equilibrium Perspective on Food Aid in Mozambique. Food Policy, 26(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00040-3

Vancouver

Tarp F, Arndt C. Who gets the Goods? A General Equilibrium Perspective on Food Aid in Mozambique. Food Policy. 2001;26(2):107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00040-3

Author

Tarp, Finn ; Arndt, Channing. / Who gets the Goods? A General Equilibrium Perspective on Food Aid in Mozambique. I: Food Policy. 2001 ; Bind 26, Nr. 2. s. 107-119.

Bibtex

@article{1942659074c611dbbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "Who gets the Goods?: A General Equilibrium Perspective on Food Aid in Mozambique",
abstract = "We employ a computable general equilibrium approach to examine the effects of alternative food aid distribution schemes for drought-response food aid to Mozambique. Alternative schemes have very distinct impacts on household welfare and prices. Compared with monetization of food aid by government, direct distribution to households (by population shares) strongly benefits rural households. Even assuming that government cannot target food aid strictly at drought-stricken rural people, our results indicate that, when improving household welfare is the primary goal of the food aid, direct distribution of food aid to households is preferred",
author = "Finn Tarp and Channing Arndt",
note = "JEL Classification: Q18, O10, D58",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00040-3",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "107--119",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who gets the Goods?

T2 - A General Equilibrium Perspective on Food Aid in Mozambique

AU - Tarp, Finn

AU - Arndt, Channing

N1 - JEL Classification: Q18, O10, D58

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We employ a computable general equilibrium approach to examine the effects of alternative food aid distribution schemes for drought-response food aid to Mozambique. Alternative schemes have very distinct impacts on household welfare and prices. Compared with monetization of food aid by government, direct distribution to households (by population shares) strongly benefits rural households. Even assuming that government cannot target food aid strictly at drought-stricken rural people, our results indicate that, when improving household welfare is the primary goal of the food aid, direct distribution of food aid to households is preferred

AB - We employ a computable general equilibrium approach to examine the effects of alternative food aid distribution schemes for drought-response food aid to Mozambique. Alternative schemes have very distinct impacts on household welfare and prices. Compared with monetization of food aid by government, direct distribution to households (by population shares) strongly benefits rural households. Even assuming that government cannot target food aid strictly at drought-stricken rural people, our results indicate that, when improving household welfare is the primary goal of the food aid, direct distribution of food aid to households is preferred

U2 - 10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00040-3

DO - 10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00040-3

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 107

EP - 119

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 145511