While waiting for the answer: A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

While waiting for the answer : A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management. / Casse, Thorkil; Milhøj, Anders.

I: Journal of Environmental Management, Bind 131, 2013, s. 334-342.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Casse, T & Milhøj, A 2013, 'While waiting for the answer: A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management', Journal of Environmental Management, bind 131, s. 334-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.042

APA

Casse, T., & Milhøj, A. (2013). While waiting for the answer: A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management. Journal of Environmental Management, 131, 334-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.042

Vancouver

Casse T, Milhøj A. While waiting for the answer: A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management. Journal of Environmental Management. 2013;131:334-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.042

Author

Casse, Thorkil ; Milhøj, Anders. / While waiting for the answer : A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management. I: Journal of Environmental Management. 2013 ; Bind 131. s. 334-342.

Bibtex

@article{c1bf9f9a89a242769ceda1ae03f53cb7,
title = "While waiting for the answer: A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management",
abstract = "This paper assesses the existing meta-studies of forestry conservation. Most of meta-studies have focused on either the performance of protected areas or the community managed forests. Only one article has directly compared the performance of the two management forms. Porter-Bolland et al. (2012) claim that community managed forests presented a lower mean deforestation rate than protected areas. We found several statistical problems and problems with definitions in all meta-studies, and we argue that the data available, not the least for community managed forest, does not allow for genuine global comparison. Using similar measuring techniques and same definitions when comparing the two management forms are necessities when trying to reach a general conclusion about which management form is best.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Meta-studies in forestry , Protected areas, Parametric and non-parametric tests, Community managed forests",
author = "Thorkil Casse and Anders Milh{\o}j",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.042",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "334--342",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - While waiting for the answer

T2 - A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management

AU - Casse, Thorkil

AU - Milhøj, Anders

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper assesses the existing meta-studies of forestry conservation. Most of meta-studies have focused on either the performance of protected areas or the community managed forests. Only one article has directly compared the performance of the two management forms. Porter-Bolland et al. (2012) claim that community managed forests presented a lower mean deforestation rate than protected areas. We found several statistical problems and problems with definitions in all meta-studies, and we argue that the data available, not the least for community managed forest, does not allow for genuine global comparison. Using similar measuring techniques and same definitions when comparing the two management forms are necessities when trying to reach a general conclusion about which management form is best.

AB - This paper assesses the existing meta-studies of forestry conservation. Most of meta-studies have focused on either the performance of protected areas or the community managed forests. Only one article has directly compared the performance of the two management forms. Porter-Bolland et al. (2012) claim that community managed forests presented a lower mean deforestation rate than protected areas. We found several statistical problems and problems with definitions in all meta-studies, and we argue that the data available, not the least for community managed forest, does not allow for genuine global comparison. Using similar measuring techniques and same definitions when comparing the two management forms are necessities when trying to reach a general conclusion about which management form is best.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Meta-studies in forestry

KW - Protected areas

KW - Parametric and non-parametric tests

KW - Community managed forests

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.042

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.042

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24211381

VL - 131

SP - 334

EP - 342

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -

ID: 91427303