The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence From an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence From an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark. / Agersnap, Ole ; Jensen, Amalie Sofie; Kleven, Henrik.

I: American Economic Review: Insights, Bind 2, Nr. 4, 01.12.2020, s. 527–542.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Agersnap, O, Jensen, AS & Kleven, H 2020, 'The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence From an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark', American Economic Review: Insights, bind 2, nr. 4, s. 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20190510

APA

Agersnap, O., Jensen, A. S., & Kleven, H. (2020). The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence From an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark. American Economic Review: Insights, 2(4), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20190510

Vancouver

Agersnap O, Jensen AS, Kleven H. The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence From an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark. American Economic Review: Insights. 2020 dec. 1;2(4):527–542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20190510

Author

Agersnap, Ole ; Jensen, Amalie Sofie ; Kleven, Henrik. / The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence From an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark. I: American Economic Review: Insights. 2020 ; Bind 2, Nr. 4. s. 527–542.

Bibtex

@article{20b226ad536343d5a68b754fbcdb1097,
title = "The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence From an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark",
abstract = "We study the effects of welfare generosity on international migra- tion using reforms of immigrant welfare benefits in Denmark. The first reform, implemented in 2002, lowered benefits for non-EU immigrants by about 50 percent, with no changes for natives or EU immigrants. The policy was later repealed and reintroduced. Based on a quasi-experimental research design, we find sizable effects: the benefit reduction reduced the net flow of immigrants by about 5,000 people per year, and the subsequent repeal of the policy reversed the effect almost exactly. The implied elasticity of migration with respect to benefits equals 1.3. This represents some of the first causal evi- dence on the welfare magnet hypothesis. ",
author = "Ole Agersnap and Jensen, {Amalie Sofie} and Henrik Kleven",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1257/aeri.20190510",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "527–542",
journal = "American Economic Review: Insights",
issn = "2640-205X",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Welfare Magnet Hypothesis: Evidence From an Immigrant Welfare Scheme in Denmark

AU - Agersnap, Ole

AU - Jensen, Amalie Sofie

AU - Kleven, Henrik

PY - 2020/12/1

Y1 - 2020/12/1

N2 - We study the effects of welfare generosity on international migra- tion using reforms of immigrant welfare benefits in Denmark. The first reform, implemented in 2002, lowered benefits for non-EU immigrants by about 50 percent, with no changes for natives or EU immigrants. The policy was later repealed and reintroduced. Based on a quasi-experimental research design, we find sizable effects: the benefit reduction reduced the net flow of immigrants by about 5,000 people per year, and the subsequent repeal of the policy reversed the effect almost exactly. The implied elasticity of migration with respect to benefits equals 1.3. This represents some of the first causal evi- dence on the welfare magnet hypothesis.

AB - We study the effects of welfare generosity on international migra- tion using reforms of immigrant welfare benefits in Denmark. The first reform, implemented in 2002, lowered benefits for non-EU immigrants by about 50 percent, with no changes for natives or EU immigrants. The policy was later repealed and reintroduced. Based on a quasi-experimental research design, we find sizable effects: the benefit reduction reduced the net flow of immigrants by about 5,000 people per year, and the subsequent repeal of the policy reversed the effect almost exactly. The implied elasticity of migration with respect to benefits equals 1.3. This represents some of the first causal evi- dence on the welfare magnet hypothesis.

U2 - 10.1257/aeri.20190510

DO - 10.1257/aeri.20190510

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 527

EP - 542

JO - American Economic Review: Insights

JF - American Economic Review: Insights

SN - 2640-205X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 244917155