Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments: A Reappraisal

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments : A Reappraisal. / Hougaard, Jens Leth; Østerdal, Lars Peter; Tjur, Tue.

Cph. : Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2006.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Hougaard, JL, Østerdal, LP & Tjur, T 2006 'Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments: A Reappraisal' Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Cph.

APA

Hougaard, J. L., Østerdal, L. P., & Tjur, T. (2006). Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments: A Reappraisal. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

Vancouver

Hougaard JL, Østerdal LP, Tjur T. Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments: A Reappraisal. Cph.: Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. 2006.

Author

Hougaard, Jens Leth ; Østerdal, Lars Peter ; Tjur, Tue. / Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments : A Reappraisal. Cph. : Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2006.

Bibtex

@techreport{dadc5c60a48211dbbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments: A Reappraisal",
abstract = "Recent studies have tested the preference axioms of completeness and transitivity, and have detected other preference phenomena such as unstability, learning- and tiredness effects, ordering effects and dominance, in stated preference discrete choice experiments. However, it has not been explicitly addressed in these studies which preference models are actually being tested, and the connection between the statistical tests performed and the relevant underlying models of respondent behavior has not been explored further. This paper tries to fill that gap. We specifically analyze the meaning and role of the preference axioms and other preference phenomena in the context of stated preference discrete choice experiments, and examine whether or how these can be subject to meaningful (statistical) tests",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, statistical tests, random utility, transitivity, stated preference discrete choice experiments",
author = "Hougaard, {Jens Leth} and {\O}sterdal, {Lars Peter} and Tue Tjur",
note = "JEL Classification: B41, C52, D01",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments

T2 - A Reappraisal

AU - Hougaard, Jens Leth

AU - Østerdal, Lars Peter

AU - Tjur, Tue

N1 - JEL Classification: B41, C52, D01

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Recent studies have tested the preference axioms of completeness and transitivity, and have detected other preference phenomena such as unstability, learning- and tiredness effects, ordering effects and dominance, in stated preference discrete choice experiments. However, it has not been explicitly addressed in these studies which preference models are actually being tested, and the connection between the statistical tests performed and the relevant underlying models of respondent behavior has not been explored further. This paper tries to fill that gap. We specifically analyze the meaning and role of the preference axioms and other preference phenomena in the context of stated preference discrete choice experiments, and examine whether or how these can be subject to meaningful (statistical) tests

AB - Recent studies have tested the preference axioms of completeness and transitivity, and have detected other preference phenomena such as unstability, learning- and tiredness effects, ordering effects and dominance, in stated preference discrete choice experiments. However, it has not been explicitly addressed in these studies which preference models are actually being tested, and the connection between the statistical tests performed and the relevant underlying models of respondent behavior has not been explored further. This paper tries to fill that gap. We specifically analyze the meaning and role of the preference axioms and other preference phenomena in the context of stated preference discrete choice experiments, and examine whether or how these can be subject to meaningful (statistical) tests

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - statistical tests

KW - random utility

KW - transitivity

KW - stated preference discrete choice experiments

M3 - Working paper

BT - Testing Preference Axioms in Discrete Choice experiments

PB - Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen

CY - Cph.

ER -

ID: 312580