Misreporting Month of Birth: Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Misreporting Month of Birth : Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries. / Larsen, Anna Folke; Headey, Derek; Masters, William A.

I: Demography, Bind 56, Nr. 2, 15.04.2019, s. 707-728.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Larsen, AF, Headey, D & Masters, WA 2019, 'Misreporting Month of Birth: Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries', Demography, bind 56, nr. 2, s. 707-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0753-9

APA

Larsen, A. F., Headey, D., & Masters, W. A. (2019). Misreporting Month of Birth: Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries. Demography, 56(2), 707-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0753-9

Vancouver

Larsen AF, Headey D, Masters WA. Misreporting Month of Birth: Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries. Demography. 2019 apr. 15;56(2):707-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0753-9

Author

Larsen, Anna Folke ; Headey, Derek ; Masters, William A. / Misreporting Month of Birth : Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries. I: Demography. 2019 ; Bind 56, Nr. 2. s. 707-728.

Bibtex

@article{4c21da2b591648feb8a353b009e78576,
title = "Misreporting Month of Birth: Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries",
abstract = "A large literature has used children{\textquoteright}s birthdays to identify exposure to shocks and estimate their impacts on later outcomes. Using height-for-age z scores (HAZ) for more than 990,000 children in 62 countries from 163 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), we show how random errors in birth dates create artifacts in HAZ that can be used to diagnose the extent of age misreporting. The most important artifact is an upward gradient in HAZ by recorded month of birth (MOB) from start to end of calendar years, resulting in a large HAZ differential between December- and January-born children of –0.32 HAZ points. We observe a second artifact associated with round ages, with a downward gradient in HAZ by recorded age in months, and then an upward step after reaching ages 2, 3, and 4. These artifacts have previously been interpreted as actual health shocks. We show that they are not related to agroclimatic conditions but are instead linked to the type of calendar used and arise mainly when enumerators do not see the child{\textquoteright}s birth registration cards. We explain the size of the December–January gap through simulation in which 11 % of children have their birth date replaced by a random month. We find a minor impact on the average stunting rate but a larger impact in specific error-prone surveys. We further show how misreporting MOB causes attenuation bias when MOB is used for identification of shock exposure as well as systematic bias in the impact on HAZ of events that occur early or late in each calendar year.",
keywords = "Child age, Height-for-age, Measurement error, Nutrition, Stunting",
author = "Larsen, {Anna Folke} and Derek Headey and Masters, {William A.}",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s13524-018-0753-9",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "707--728",
journal = "Demography",
issn = "0070-3370",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misreporting Month of Birth

T2 - Diagnosis and Implications for Research on Nutrition and Early Childhood in Developing Countries

AU - Larsen, Anna Folke

AU - Headey, Derek

AU - Masters, William A.

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - A large literature has used children’s birthdays to identify exposure to shocks and estimate their impacts on later outcomes. Using height-for-age z scores (HAZ) for more than 990,000 children in 62 countries from 163 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), we show how random errors in birth dates create artifacts in HAZ that can be used to diagnose the extent of age misreporting. The most important artifact is an upward gradient in HAZ by recorded month of birth (MOB) from start to end of calendar years, resulting in a large HAZ differential between December- and January-born children of –0.32 HAZ points. We observe a second artifact associated with round ages, with a downward gradient in HAZ by recorded age in months, and then an upward step after reaching ages 2, 3, and 4. These artifacts have previously been interpreted as actual health shocks. We show that they are not related to agroclimatic conditions but are instead linked to the type of calendar used and arise mainly when enumerators do not see the child’s birth registration cards. We explain the size of the December–January gap through simulation in which 11 % of children have their birth date replaced by a random month. We find a minor impact on the average stunting rate but a larger impact in specific error-prone surveys. We further show how misreporting MOB causes attenuation bias when MOB is used for identification of shock exposure as well as systematic bias in the impact on HAZ of events that occur early or late in each calendar year.

AB - A large literature has used children’s birthdays to identify exposure to shocks and estimate their impacts on later outcomes. Using height-for-age z scores (HAZ) for more than 990,000 children in 62 countries from 163 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), we show how random errors in birth dates create artifacts in HAZ that can be used to diagnose the extent of age misreporting. The most important artifact is an upward gradient in HAZ by recorded month of birth (MOB) from start to end of calendar years, resulting in a large HAZ differential between December- and January-born children of –0.32 HAZ points. We observe a second artifact associated with round ages, with a downward gradient in HAZ by recorded age in months, and then an upward step after reaching ages 2, 3, and 4. These artifacts have previously been interpreted as actual health shocks. We show that they are not related to agroclimatic conditions but are instead linked to the type of calendar used and arise mainly when enumerators do not see the child’s birth registration cards. We explain the size of the December–January gap through simulation in which 11 % of children have their birth date replaced by a random month. We find a minor impact on the average stunting rate but a larger impact in specific error-prone surveys. We further show how misreporting MOB causes attenuation bias when MOB is used for identification of shock exposure as well as systematic bias in the impact on HAZ of events that occur early or late in each calendar year.

KW - Child age

KW - Height-for-age

KW - Measurement error

KW - Nutrition

KW - Stunting

U2 - 10.1007/s13524-018-0753-9

DO - 10.1007/s13524-018-0753-9

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30693449

AN - SCOPUS:85061038473

VL - 56

SP - 707

EP - 728

JO - Demography

JF - Demography

SN - 0070-3370

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 226531493