Marketing margins and agricultural technology in Mozambique

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Marketing margins and agricultural technology in Mozambique. / Arndt, Channing; Jensen, Henning Tarp; Robinson, Sherman; Tarp, Finn.

I: Journal of Development Studies, Bind 37, Nr. 1, 2000, s. 121-137.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Arndt, C, Jensen, HT, Robinson, S & Tarp, F 2000, 'Marketing margins and agricultural technology in Mozambique', Journal of Development Studies, bind 37, nr. 1, s. 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/713600061

APA

Arndt, C., Jensen, H. T., Robinson, S., & Tarp, F. (2000). Marketing margins and agricultural technology in Mozambique. Journal of Development Studies, 37(1), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/713600061

Vancouver

Arndt C, Jensen HT, Robinson S, Tarp F. Marketing margins and agricultural technology in Mozambique. Journal of Development Studies. 2000;37(1):121-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/713600061

Author

Arndt, Channing ; Jensen, Henning Tarp ; Robinson, Sherman ; Tarp, Finn. / Marketing margins and agricultural technology in Mozambique. I: Journal of Development Studies. 2000 ; Bind 37, Nr. 1. s. 121-137.

Bibtex

@article{4ec45d4074c611dbbee902004c4f4f50,
title = "Marketing margins and agricultural technology in Mozambique",
abstract = "Improvements in agricultural productivity and reductions in marketing costs in Mozambique are analysed using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. The model incorporates detailed marketing margins and separates household demand for marketed and home-produced goods. Individual simulations of improved agricultural technology and lower marketing margins yield welfare gains across the economy. In addition, a combined scenario reveals significant synergy effects, as gains exceed the sum of gains from the individual scenarios. Relative welfare improvements are higher for poor rural households, while factor returns increase in roughly equal proportions, an attractive feature when assessing the political feasibility of policy initiatives",
author = "Channing Arndt and Jensen, {Henning Tarp} and Sherman Robinson and Finn Tarp",
note = "JEL Classification: D58, O13, Q18",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1080/713600061",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "121--137",
journal = "Journal of Development Studies",
issn = "0022-0388",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marketing margins and agricultural technology in Mozambique

AU - Arndt, Channing

AU - Jensen, Henning Tarp

AU - Robinson, Sherman

AU - Tarp, Finn

N1 - JEL Classification: D58, O13, Q18

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Improvements in agricultural productivity and reductions in marketing costs in Mozambique are analysed using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. The model incorporates detailed marketing margins and separates household demand for marketed and home-produced goods. Individual simulations of improved agricultural technology and lower marketing margins yield welfare gains across the economy. In addition, a combined scenario reveals significant synergy effects, as gains exceed the sum of gains from the individual scenarios. Relative welfare improvements are higher for poor rural households, while factor returns increase in roughly equal proportions, an attractive feature when assessing the political feasibility of policy initiatives

AB - Improvements in agricultural productivity and reductions in marketing costs in Mozambique are analysed using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. The model incorporates detailed marketing margins and separates household demand for marketed and home-produced goods. Individual simulations of improved agricultural technology and lower marketing margins yield welfare gains across the economy. In addition, a combined scenario reveals significant synergy effects, as gains exceed the sum of gains from the individual scenarios. Relative welfare improvements are higher for poor rural households, while factor returns increase in roughly equal proportions, an attractive feature when assessing the political feasibility of policy initiatives

U2 - 10.1080/713600061

DO - 10.1080/713600061

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 121

EP - 137

JO - Journal of Development Studies

JF - Journal of Development Studies

SN - 0022-0388

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 149720