Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time. / Hedegaard, Morten; Kerschbamer, Rudolf; Müller, Daniel; Tyran, Jean-Robert.

2019.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Hedegaard, M, Kerschbamer, R, Müller, D & Tyran, J-R 2019 'Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time'. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3388681

APA

Hedegaard, M., Kerschbamer, R., Müller, D., & Tyran, J-R. (2019). Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time. University of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online) Nr. 19-06 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3388681

Vancouver

Hedegaard M, Kerschbamer R, Müller D, Tyran J-R. Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time. 2019 jun. 4. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3388681

Author

Hedegaard, Morten ; Kerschbamer, Rudolf ; Müller, Daniel ; Tyran, Jean-Robert. / Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time. 2019. (University of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online); Nr. 19-06).

Bibtex

@techreport{15ba570ec81f43a7a5b2ad5ddc8efc20,
title = "Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time",
abstract = "We use a large and heterogeneous sample of the Danish population to investigate the importance of distributional preferences for behavior in a public good game and a trust game. We find robust evidence for the significant explanatory power of distributional preferences. In fact, compared to twenty-one covariates, distributional preferences turn out to be the single most important predictor of behavior. Specifically, subjects who reveal benevolence in the domain of advantageous inequality contribute more to the public good and are more likely to pick the trustworthy action in the trust game than other subjects. Since the experiments were spread out more than one year, our results suggest that there is a component of distributional preferences that is stable across games and over time.",
keywords = "distributional preferences, social preferences, Equality-Equivalence Test, representative online experiment, trust game, public goods game, dictator game",
author = "Morten Hedegaard and Rudolf Kerschbamer and Daniel M{\"u}ller and Jean-Robert Tyran",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "4",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.3388681",
language = "English",
series = "University of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online)",
number = "19-06",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time

AU - Hedegaard, Morten

AU - Kerschbamer, Rudolf

AU - Müller, Daniel

AU - Tyran, Jean-Robert

PY - 2019/6/4

Y1 - 2019/6/4

N2 - We use a large and heterogeneous sample of the Danish population to investigate the importance of distributional preferences for behavior in a public good game and a trust game. We find robust evidence for the significant explanatory power of distributional preferences. In fact, compared to twenty-one covariates, distributional preferences turn out to be the single most important predictor of behavior. Specifically, subjects who reveal benevolence in the domain of advantageous inequality contribute more to the public good and are more likely to pick the trustworthy action in the trust game than other subjects. Since the experiments were spread out more than one year, our results suggest that there is a component of distributional preferences that is stable across games and over time.

AB - We use a large and heterogeneous sample of the Danish population to investigate the importance of distributional preferences for behavior in a public good game and a trust game. We find robust evidence for the significant explanatory power of distributional preferences. In fact, compared to twenty-one covariates, distributional preferences turn out to be the single most important predictor of behavior. Specifically, subjects who reveal benevolence in the domain of advantageous inequality contribute more to the public good and are more likely to pick the trustworthy action in the trust game than other subjects. Since the experiments were spread out more than one year, our results suggest that there is a component of distributional preferences that is stable across games and over time.

KW - distributional preferences

KW - social preferences

KW - Equality-Equivalence Test

KW - representative online experiment

KW - trust game

KW - public goods game

KW - dictator game

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3388681

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3388681

M3 - Working paper

T3 - University of Copenhagen. Institute of Economics. Discussion Papers (Online)

BT - Distributional Preferences Explain Individual Behavior Across Games and Time

ER -

ID: 241647721