Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Publikation: Working paper › Forskning

Standard

Defaults and Donations : Evidence from a Field Experiment. / Altmann, Steffen; Falk, Armin; Heidhues, Paul; Jayaraman, Rajshri .

Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 2014.

Publikation: Working paper › Forskning

Harvard

Altmann, S, Falk, A, Heidhues, P & Jayaraman, R 2014 'Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment' Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). <http://ftp.iza.org/dp8680.pdf>

APA

Altmann, S., Falk, A., Heidhues, P., & Jayaraman, R. (2014). Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). IZA Discussion Paper Nr. 8680 http://ftp.iza.org/dp8680.pdf

Vancouver

Altmann S, Falk A, Heidhues P, Jayaraman R. Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). 2014.

Author

Altmann, Steffen ; Falk, Armin ; Heidhues, Paul ; Jayaraman, Rajshri . / Defaults and Donations : Evidence from a Field Experiment. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 2014. (IZA Discussion Paper; Nr. 8680).

Bibtex

@techreport{4525a00656ce4f6fa99282ebcf4a5738,
title = "Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment",
abstract = "We study how website defaults affect consumer behavior in the domain of charitable giving. In a field experiment that was conducted on a large platform for making charitable donations over the web, we exogenously vary the default options in two distinct choice dimensions. The first pertains to the primary donation decision, namely, how much to contribute to the charitable cause. The second relates to an {"}add-on{"} decision of how much to contribute to supporting the online platform itself. We find a strong impact of defaults on individual behavior: in each of our treatments, the modal positive contributions in both choice dimensions invariably correspond to the specified default amounts. Defaults, nevertheless, have no impact on aggregate donations. This is because defaults in the donation domain induce some people to donate more and others to donate less than they otherwise would have. In contrast, higher defaults in the secondary choice dimension unambiguously induce higher contributions to the online platform.",
author = "Steffen Altmann and Armin Falk and Paul Heidhues and Rajshri Jayaraman",
note = "JEL Classification: C93, D03, D64",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
series = "IZA Discussion Paper",
number = "8680",
publisher = "Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Defaults and Donations

T2 - Evidence from a Field Experiment

AU - Altmann, Steffen

AU - Falk, Armin

AU - Heidhues, Paul

AU - Jayaraman, Rajshri

N1 - JEL Classification: C93, D03, D64

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We study how website defaults affect consumer behavior in the domain of charitable giving. In a field experiment that was conducted on a large platform for making charitable donations over the web, we exogenously vary the default options in two distinct choice dimensions. The first pertains to the primary donation decision, namely, how much to contribute to the charitable cause. The second relates to an "add-on" decision of how much to contribute to supporting the online platform itself. We find a strong impact of defaults on individual behavior: in each of our treatments, the modal positive contributions in both choice dimensions invariably correspond to the specified default amounts. Defaults, nevertheless, have no impact on aggregate donations. This is because defaults in the donation domain induce some people to donate more and others to donate less than they otherwise would have. In contrast, higher defaults in the secondary choice dimension unambiguously induce higher contributions to the online platform.

AB - We study how website defaults affect consumer behavior in the domain of charitable giving. In a field experiment that was conducted on a large platform for making charitable donations over the web, we exogenously vary the default options in two distinct choice dimensions. The first pertains to the primary donation decision, namely, how much to contribute to the charitable cause. The second relates to an "add-on" decision of how much to contribute to supporting the online platform itself. We find a strong impact of defaults on individual behavior: in each of our treatments, the modal positive contributions in both choice dimensions invariably correspond to the specified default amounts. Defaults, nevertheless, have no impact on aggregate donations. This is because defaults in the donation domain induce some people to donate more and others to donate less than they otherwise would have. In contrast, higher defaults in the secondary choice dimension unambiguously induce higher contributions to the online platform.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - IZA Discussion Paper

BT - Defaults and Donations

PB - Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

ER -

ID: 130172922