Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion. / Andersson, Ola; Holm, Håkan J.; Tyran, Jean-Robert Karl; Wengström, Erik Roland.

I: Management Science, Bind 62, Nr. 1, 01.2016, s. 29-36.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Andersson, O, Holm, HJ, Tyran, J-RK & Wengström, ER 2016, 'Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion', Management Science, bind 62, nr. 1, s. 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085

APA

Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J-R. K., & Wengström, E. R. (2016). Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion. Management Science, 62(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085

Vancouver

Andersson O, Holm HJ, Tyran J-RK, Wengström ER. Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion. Management Science. 2016 jan.;62(1):29-36. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085

Author

Andersson, Ola ; Holm, Håkan J. ; Tyran, Jean-Robert Karl ; Wengström, Erik Roland. / Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion. I: Management Science. 2016 ; Bind 62, Nr. 1. s. 29-36.

Bibtex

@article{bbd165449b26464299a3d285577214d6,
title = "Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion",
abstract = "We study risk taking on behalf of others, both when choices involve losses and when they do not. A large-scale incentivized experiment with subjects randomly drawn from the Danish population is conducted. We find that deciding for others reduces loss aversion. When choosing between risky prospects for which losses are ruled out by design, subjects make the same choices for themselves as for others. In contrast, when losses are possible, we find that the two types of choices differ. In particular, we find that subjects who make choices for themselves take less risk than those who decide for others when losses loom. This finding is consistent with an interpretation of loss aversion as a bias in decision making driven by emotions and that these emotions are reduced when making decisions for others.",
author = "Ola Andersson and Holm, {H{\aa}kan J.} and Tyran, {Jean-Robert Karl} and Wengstr{\"o}m, {Erik Roland}",
note = "the article has appeared in print 2016 (electronic pre-print is 2014)",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "29--36",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (I N F O R M S)",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deciding for Others Reduces Loss Aversion

AU - Andersson, Ola

AU - Holm, Håkan J.

AU - Tyran, Jean-Robert Karl

AU - Wengström, Erik Roland

N1 - the article has appeared in print 2016 (electronic pre-print is 2014)

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - We study risk taking on behalf of others, both when choices involve losses and when they do not. A large-scale incentivized experiment with subjects randomly drawn from the Danish population is conducted. We find that deciding for others reduces loss aversion. When choosing between risky prospects for which losses are ruled out by design, subjects make the same choices for themselves as for others. In contrast, when losses are possible, we find that the two types of choices differ. In particular, we find that subjects who make choices for themselves take less risk than those who decide for others when losses loom. This finding is consistent with an interpretation of loss aversion as a bias in decision making driven by emotions and that these emotions are reduced when making decisions for others.

AB - We study risk taking on behalf of others, both when choices involve losses and when they do not. A large-scale incentivized experiment with subjects randomly drawn from the Danish population is conducted. We find that deciding for others reduces loss aversion. When choosing between risky prospects for which losses are ruled out by design, subjects make the same choices for themselves as for others. In contrast, when losses are possible, we find that the two types of choices differ. In particular, we find that subjects who make choices for themselves take less risk than those who decide for others when losses loom. This finding is consistent with an interpretation of loss aversion as a bias in decision making driven by emotions and that these emotions are reduced when making decisions for others.

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2085

M3 - Journal article

VL - 62

SP - 29

EP - 36

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 128680818