Credible sources and sophisticated voters: When does new information induce economic voting?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Credible sources and sophisticated voters : When does new information induce economic voting? / Alt, James E.; Lassen, David D.; Marshall, John.

I: The Journal of Politics, Bind 78, Nr. 2, 01.04.2016, s. 327-342.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Alt, JE, Lassen, DD & Marshall, J 2016, 'Credible sources and sophisticated voters: When does new information induce economic voting?', The Journal of Politics, bind 78, nr. 2, s. 327-342. https://doi.org/10.1086/683832

APA

Alt, J. E., Lassen, D. D., & Marshall, J. (2016). Credible sources and sophisticated voters: When does new information induce economic voting? The Journal of Politics, 78(2), 327-342. https://doi.org/10.1086/683832

Vancouver

Alt JE, Lassen DD, Marshall J. Credible sources and sophisticated voters: When does new information induce economic voting? The Journal of Politics. 2016 apr. 1;78(2):327-342. https://doi.org/10.1086/683832

Author

Alt, James E. ; Lassen, David D. ; Marshall, John. / Credible sources and sophisticated voters : When does new information induce economic voting?. I: The Journal of Politics. 2016 ; Bind 78, Nr. 2. s. 327-342.

Bibtex

@article{e9f4749f7808439e8f331b76b7bb913f,
title = "Credible sources and sophisticated voters: When does new information induce economic voting?",
abstract = "When does new economic information cause voters to reevaluate the government's competence and ultimately vote economically? Since politically relevant information is often conveyed by actors with incentives to influence voter perceptions, the credibility of information sources can vary significantly. This article randomly varies whether voters receive an aggregate unemployment forecast from the central bank, government or main opposition party using a survey experiment in Denmark linked to detailed panel data. We find that politically sophisticated voters discern differences in institutional credibility and the political cost of the signal and update their unemployment expectations accordingly. Despite failing to differentiate political costs, unsophisticated voters still substantially update their expectations. However, while sophisticated voters intend to engage in substantial prospective economic voting, unsophisticated voters do not relate their new unemployment expectations to their vote intention. These findings suggest that economic information supports economic voting most when it is credible and reaches sophisticated voters.",
author = "Alt, {James E.} and Lassen, {David D.} and John Marshall",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/683832",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "327--342",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Credible sources and sophisticated voters

T2 - When does new information induce economic voting?

AU - Alt, James E.

AU - Lassen, David D.

AU - Marshall, John

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - When does new economic information cause voters to reevaluate the government's competence and ultimately vote economically? Since politically relevant information is often conveyed by actors with incentives to influence voter perceptions, the credibility of information sources can vary significantly. This article randomly varies whether voters receive an aggregate unemployment forecast from the central bank, government or main opposition party using a survey experiment in Denmark linked to detailed panel data. We find that politically sophisticated voters discern differences in institutional credibility and the political cost of the signal and update their unemployment expectations accordingly. Despite failing to differentiate political costs, unsophisticated voters still substantially update their expectations. However, while sophisticated voters intend to engage in substantial prospective economic voting, unsophisticated voters do not relate their new unemployment expectations to their vote intention. These findings suggest that economic information supports economic voting most when it is credible and reaches sophisticated voters.

AB - When does new economic information cause voters to reevaluate the government's competence and ultimately vote economically? Since politically relevant information is often conveyed by actors with incentives to influence voter perceptions, the credibility of information sources can vary significantly. This article randomly varies whether voters receive an aggregate unemployment forecast from the central bank, government or main opposition party using a survey experiment in Denmark linked to detailed panel data. We find that politically sophisticated voters discern differences in institutional credibility and the political cost of the signal and update their unemployment expectations accordingly. Despite failing to differentiate political costs, unsophisticated voters still substantially update their expectations. However, while sophisticated voters intend to engage in substantial prospective economic voting, unsophisticated voters do not relate their new unemployment expectations to their vote intention. These findings suggest that economic information supports economic voting most when it is credible and reaches sophisticated voters.

U2 - 10.1086/683832

DO - 10.1086/683832

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84983331325

VL - 78

SP - 327

EP - 342

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 165881387