Birth order and health of newborns: What can we learn from Danish registry data?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Birth order and health of newborns : What can we learn from Danish registry data? / Brenøe, Anne Ardila; Molitor, Ramona.

I: Journal of Population Economics, Bind 31, Nr. 2, 2018, s. 363-395.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Brenøe, AA & Molitor, R 2018, 'Birth order and health of newborns: What can we learn from Danish registry data?', Journal of Population Economics, bind 31, nr. 2, s. 363-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0660-1

APA

Brenøe, A. A., & Molitor, R. (2018). Birth order and health of newborns: What can we learn from Danish registry data? Journal of Population Economics, 31(2), 363-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0660-1

Vancouver

Brenøe AA, Molitor R. Birth order and health of newborns: What can we learn from Danish registry data? Journal of Population Economics. 2018;31(2):363-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0660-1

Author

Brenøe, Anne Ardila ; Molitor, Ramona. / Birth order and health of newborns : What can we learn from Danish registry data?. I: Journal of Population Economics. 2018 ; Bind 31, Nr. 2. s. 363-395.

Bibtex

@article{e8317fdfd8fa4fa5a690482797403b8b,
title = "Birth order and health of newborns: What can we learn from Danish registry data?",
abstract = "We examine birth order differences in health of newborns and follow the children throughout childhood using high-quality administrative data on individuals born in Denmark between 1981 and 2010. Family fixed effects models show a positive and robust effect of birth order on health at birth; firstborn children are less healthy at birth. During earlier pregnancies, women are more likely to smoke, receive more prenatal care, and are more likely to suffer a medical pregnancy complication, suggesting worse maternal health. We further show that the health disadvantage of firstborns persists in the first years of life, disappears by age seven, and becomes a health advantage in adolescence. In contrast, later-born children are throughout childhood more likely to suffer an injury. The results on health in adolescence are consistent with previous evidence of a firstborn advantage in education and with the hypothesis that postnatal investments differ between first- and later-born children.",
keywords = "Birth order, Child health, Fetal health, Health at birth, Prenatal investments",
author = "Bren{\o}e, {Anne Ardila} and Ramona Molitor",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s00148-017-0660-1",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "363--395",
journal = "Journal of Population Economics",
issn = "0933-1433",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Birth order and health of newborns

T2 - What can we learn from Danish registry data?

AU - Brenøe, Anne Ardila

AU - Molitor, Ramona

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - We examine birth order differences in health of newborns and follow the children throughout childhood using high-quality administrative data on individuals born in Denmark between 1981 and 2010. Family fixed effects models show a positive and robust effect of birth order on health at birth; firstborn children are less healthy at birth. During earlier pregnancies, women are more likely to smoke, receive more prenatal care, and are more likely to suffer a medical pregnancy complication, suggesting worse maternal health. We further show that the health disadvantage of firstborns persists in the first years of life, disappears by age seven, and becomes a health advantage in adolescence. In contrast, later-born children are throughout childhood more likely to suffer an injury. The results on health in adolescence are consistent with previous evidence of a firstborn advantage in education and with the hypothesis that postnatal investments differ between first- and later-born children.

AB - We examine birth order differences in health of newborns and follow the children throughout childhood using high-quality administrative data on individuals born in Denmark between 1981 and 2010. Family fixed effects models show a positive and robust effect of birth order on health at birth; firstborn children are less healthy at birth. During earlier pregnancies, women are more likely to smoke, receive more prenatal care, and are more likely to suffer a medical pregnancy complication, suggesting worse maternal health. We further show that the health disadvantage of firstborns persists in the first years of life, disappears by age seven, and becomes a health advantage in adolescence. In contrast, later-born children are throughout childhood more likely to suffer an injury. The results on health in adolescence are consistent with previous evidence of a firstborn advantage in education and with the hypothesis that postnatal investments differ between first- and later-born children.

KW - Birth order

KW - Child health

KW - Fetal health

KW - Health at birth

KW - Prenatal investments

U2 - 10.1007/s00148-017-0660-1

DO - 10.1007/s00148-017-0660-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 363

EP - 395

JO - Journal of Population Economics

JF - Journal of Population Economics

SN - 0933-1433

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 222750371