Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Generalized Markov Test

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Backtesting Value-at-Risk : A Generalized Markov Test. / Nielsen, Thor Pajhede.

I: Journal of Forecasting, Bind 36, Nr. 2, 06.02.2017, s. 597–613.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nielsen, TP 2017, 'Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Generalized Markov Test', Journal of Forecasting, bind 36, nr. 2, s. 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2456

APA

Nielsen, T. P. (2017). Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Generalized Markov Test. Journal of Forecasting, 36(2), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2456

Vancouver

Nielsen TP. Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Generalized Markov Test. Journal of Forecasting. 2017 feb. 6;36(2):597–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2456

Author

Nielsen, Thor Pajhede. / Backtesting Value-at-Risk : A Generalized Markov Test. I: Journal of Forecasting. 2017 ; Bind 36, Nr. 2. s. 597–613.

Bibtex

@article{dcf87930a8754c4fa4b10bf18dd4f1aa,
title = "Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Generalized Markov Test",
abstract = "Testing the validity of value-at-risk (VaR) forecasts, or backtesting, is an integral part of modern market risk management and regulation. This is often done by applying independence and coverage tests developed by Christoffersen (International Economic Review, 1998; 39(4), 841–862) to so-called hit-sequences derived from VaR forecasts and realized losses. However, as pointed out in the literature, these aforementioned tests suffer from low rejection frequencies, or (empirical) power when applied to hit-sequences derived from simulations matching empirical stylized characteristics of return data. One key observation of the studies is that higher-order dependence in the hit-sequences may cause the observed lower power performance. We propose to generalize the backtest framework for VaR forecasts, by extending the original first-order dependence of Christoffersen to allow for a higher- or kth-order dependence. We provide closed-form expressions for the tests as well as asymptotic theory. Not only do the generalized tests have power against kth-order dependence by definition, but also included simulations indicate improved power performance when replicating the aforementioned studies. Further, included simulations show much improved size properties of one of the suggested tests.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, value-at-risk, backtesting, Markov chain, duration, quantile, likelihood ratio, maximum likelihood",
author = "Nielsen, {Thor Pajhede}",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1002/for.2456",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "597–613",
journal = "Journal of Forecasting",
issn = "0277-6693",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Backtesting Value-at-Risk

T2 - A Generalized Markov Test

AU - Nielsen, Thor Pajhede

PY - 2017/2/6

Y1 - 2017/2/6

N2 - Testing the validity of value-at-risk (VaR) forecasts, or backtesting, is an integral part of modern market risk management and regulation. This is often done by applying independence and coverage tests developed by Christoffersen (International Economic Review, 1998; 39(4), 841–862) to so-called hit-sequences derived from VaR forecasts and realized losses. However, as pointed out in the literature, these aforementioned tests suffer from low rejection frequencies, or (empirical) power when applied to hit-sequences derived from simulations matching empirical stylized characteristics of return data. One key observation of the studies is that higher-order dependence in the hit-sequences may cause the observed lower power performance. We propose to generalize the backtest framework for VaR forecasts, by extending the original first-order dependence of Christoffersen to allow for a higher- or kth-order dependence. We provide closed-form expressions for the tests as well as asymptotic theory. Not only do the generalized tests have power against kth-order dependence by definition, but also included simulations indicate improved power performance when replicating the aforementioned studies. Further, included simulations show much improved size properties of one of the suggested tests.

AB - Testing the validity of value-at-risk (VaR) forecasts, or backtesting, is an integral part of modern market risk management and regulation. This is often done by applying independence and coverage tests developed by Christoffersen (International Economic Review, 1998; 39(4), 841–862) to so-called hit-sequences derived from VaR forecasts and realized losses. However, as pointed out in the literature, these aforementioned tests suffer from low rejection frequencies, or (empirical) power when applied to hit-sequences derived from simulations matching empirical stylized characteristics of return data. One key observation of the studies is that higher-order dependence in the hit-sequences may cause the observed lower power performance. We propose to generalize the backtest framework for VaR forecasts, by extending the original first-order dependence of Christoffersen to allow for a higher- or kth-order dependence. We provide closed-form expressions for the tests as well as asymptotic theory. Not only do the generalized tests have power against kth-order dependence by definition, but also included simulations indicate improved power performance when replicating the aforementioned studies. Further, included simulations show much improved size properties of one of the suggested tests.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - value-at-risk

KW - backtesting

KW - Markov chain

KW - duration

KW - quantile

KW - likelihood ratio

KW - maximum likelihood

U2 - 10.1002/for.2456

DO - 10.1002/for.2456

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 597

EP - 613

JO - Journal of Forecasting

JF - Journal of Forecasting

SN - 0277-6693

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 173870117