A note on testing guilt aversion

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

A note on testing guilt aversion. / Bellemare, Charles; Sebald, Alexander Christopher; Suetens, Sigrid.

I: Games and Economic Behavior, Bind 102, 03.2017, s. 233-239.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bellemare, C, Sebald, AC & Suetens, S 2017, 'A note on testing guilt aversion', Games and Economic Behavior, bind 102, s. 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002

APA

Bellemare, C., Sebald, A. C., & Suetens, S. (2017). A note on testing guilt aversion. Games and Economic Behavior, 102, 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002

Vancouver

Bellemare C, Sebald AC, Suetens S. A note on testing guilt aversion. Games and Economic Behavior. 2017 mar.;102:233-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002

Author

Bellemare, Charles ; Sebald, Alexander Christopher ; Suetens, Sigrid. / A note on testing guilt aversion. I: Games and Economic Behavior. 2017 ; Bind 102. s. 233-239.

Bibtex

@article{d609effa7d1e40e1bba60e44f1f0439e,
title = "A note on testing guilt aversion",
abstract = "We compare three approaches to test for guilt aversion in two economic experiments. The first approach elicits second-order beliefs using self-reports. The second approach discloses first-order beliefs of matched players to decision makers, which are taken as exogenous second-order beliefs of decision makers. The third approach lets decision makers make choices conditional on a sequence of possible first-order beliefs of matched players. We find that the first and third approach generate similar results, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The second approach, however, generates significantly higher levels of {\textquoteleft}kindness{\textquoteright} for low levels of beliefs: at a second-order belief of zero, the probability of choosing the {\textquoteleft}kind{\textquoteright} action is between 43 and 65 percentage points higher than with the other approaches.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, A13, C91, Guilt aversion, Elicitation method",
author = "Charles Bellemare and Sebald, {Alexander Christopher} and Sigrid Suetens",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "233--239",
journal = "Games and Economic Behavior",
issn = "0899-8256",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on testing guilt aversion

AU - Bellemare, Charles

AU - Sebald, Alexander Christopher

AU - Suetens, Sigrid

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - We compare three approaches to test for guilt aversion in two economic experiments. The first approach elicits second-order beliefs using self-reports. The second approach discloses first-order beliefs of matched players to decision makers, which are taken as exogenous second-order beliefs of decision makers. The third approach lets decision makers make choices conditional on a sequence of possible first-order beliefs of matched players. We find that the first and third approach generate similar results, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The second approach, however, generates significantly higher levels of ‘kindness’ for low levels of beliefs: at a second-order belief of zero, the probability of choosing the ‘kind’ action is between 43 and 65 percentage points higher than with the other approaches.

AB - We compare three approaches to test for guilt aversion in two economic experiments. The first approach elicits second-order beliefs using self-reports. The second approach discloses first-order beliefs of matched players to decision makers, which are taken as exogenous second-order beliefs of decision makers. The third approach lets decision makers make choices conditional on a sequence of possible first-order beliefs of matched players. We find that the first and third approach generate similar results, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The second approach, however, generates significantly higher levels of ‘kindness’ for low levels of beliefs: at a second-order belief of zero, the probability of choosing the ‘kind’ action is between 43 and 65 percentage points higher than with the other approaches.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - A13

KW - C91

KW - Guilt aversion

KW - Elicitation method

U2 - 10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 102

SP - 233

EP - 239

JO - Games and Economic Behavior

JF - Games and Economic Behavior

SN - 0899-8256

ER -

ID: 173937200