Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Standard

Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods : Experimental Evidence. / Rauchdobler, Julian; Sausgruber, Rupert; Tyran, Jean-Robert.

Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2009.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Harvard

Rauchdobler, J, Sausgruber, R & Tyran, J-R 2009 'Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence' Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

APA

Rauchdobler, J., Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J-R. (2009). Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

Vancouver

Rauchdobler J, Sausgruber R, Tyran J-R. Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. 2009.

Author

Rauchdobler, Julian ; Sausgruber, Rupert ; Tyran, Jean-Robert. / Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods : Experimental Evidence. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2009.

Bibtex

@techreport{85b5053004e111df825d000ea68e967b,
title = "Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods: Experimental Evidence",
abstract = "Introducing a threshold in the sense of a minimal project size transforms a public goods game with an inefficient equilibrium into a coordination game with a set of Pareto-superior equilibria. Thresholds may therefore improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. In our one-shot experiment, we find that coordination often fails and exogenously imposed thresholds are ineffective at best and often counter-productive. This holds under a range of threshold levels and refund rates. We test if thresholds perform better if they are endogenously chosen, i.e. if a threshold is approved in a referendum, because voting may facilitate coordination due to signaling and commitment effects. We find that voting does have signaling and commitment effects but they are not strong enough to significantly improve the efficiency of thresholds.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, provision of public goods, threshold, experiment",
author = "Julian Rauchdobler and Rupert Sausgruber and Jean-Robert Tyran",
note = "JEL classification: H41, D72, C92",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods

T2 - Experimental Evidence

AU - Rauchdobler, Julian

AU - Sausgruber, Rupert

AU - Tyran, Jean-Robert

N1 - JEL classification: H41, D72, C92

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Introducing a threshold in the sense of a minimal project size transforms a public goods game with an inefficient equilibrium into a coordination game with a set of Pareto-superior equilibria. Thresholds may therefore improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. In our one-shot experiment, we find that coordination often fails and exogenously imposed thresholds are ineffective at best and often counter-productive. This holds under a range of threshold levels and refund rates. We test if thresholds perform better if they are endogenously chosen, i.e. if a threshold is approved in a referendum, because voting may facilitate coordination due to signaling and commitment effects. We find that voting does have signaling and commitment effects but they are not strong enough to significantly improve the efficiency of thresholds.

AB - Introducing a threshold in the sense of a minimal project size transforms a public goods game with an inefficient equilibrium into a coordination game with a set of Pareto-superior equilibria. Thresholds may therefore improve efficiency in the voluntary provision of public goods. In our one-shot experiment, we find that coordination often fails and exogenously imposed thresholds are ineffective at best and often counter-productive. This holds under a range of threshold levels and refund rates. We test if thresholds perform better if they are endogenously chosen, i.e. if a threshold is approved in a referendum, because voting may facilitate coordination due to signaling and commitment effects. We find that voting does have signaling and commitment effects but they are not strong enough to significantly improve the efficiency of thresholds.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - provision of public goods

KW - threshold

KW - experiment

M3 - Working paper

BT - Voting on Thresholds for Public Goods

PB - Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 17083792