Did Apple Pay Too Little Tax? Appealing the EU Ruling on Illegal State Aid

Publikation: AndetUdgivelser på nettet - Net-publikationUndervisning

Standard

Did Apple Pay Too Little Tax? Appealing the EU Ruling on Illegal State Aid. / Bennedsen, Morten; Henry, Brian; Roulette, Alexandra ; Stabile, Mark.

13 s. INSEAD Publishing. 2018.

Publikation: AndetUdgivelser på nettet - Net-publikationUndervisning

Harvard

Bennedsen, M, Henry, B, Roulette, A & Stabile, M 2018, Did Apple Pay Too Little Tax? Appealing the EU Ruling on Illegal State Aid. INSEAD Publishing. <http://casecent.re/p/142745>

APA

Bennedsen, M., Henry, B., Roulette, A., & Stabile, M. (2018, maj). Did Apple Pay Too Little Tax? Appealing the EU Ruling on Illegal State Aid. INSEAD Publishing. http://casecent.re/p/142745

Vancouver

Bennedsen M, Henry B, Roulette A, Stabile M. Did Apple Pay Too Little Tax? Appealing the EU Ruling on Illegal State Aid. 2018. 13 s.

Author

Bennedsen, Morten ; Henry, Brian ; Roulette, Alexandra ; Stabile, Mark. / Did Apple Pay Too Little Tax? Appealing the EU Ruling on Illegal State Aid. 2018. INSEAD Publishing. 13 s.

Bibtex

@misc{96c4b946560f443683093c0f58bcd3ab,
title = "Did Apple Pay Too Little Tax?: Appealing the EU Ruling on Illegal State Aid",
abstract = "On 30 August 2016, Margrethe Vestager, the European Commissioner for Competition, ordered Ireland to recover €13 billion in illegal state aid that the state had granted Apple over a decade from 2003. In allowing Apple to pay close to zero in taxes, she ruled, Ireland had given the foreign company a selective advantage over other businesses paying the regular corporate tax rate of 12.5%. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, and Enda Kenny, the Irish Prime Minister, appealed the ruling, a process that is still ongoing. The case explores this event from five analytical pillars: 1) the role of Ireland{\textquoteright}s low corporate tax rate in attracting FDI; 2) Apple{\textquoteright}s decision to allocate its earnings to a paper company in Ireland with no physical presence in the country; 3) the repatriation of foreign earnings to the United States; 4) the transfer payments that Apple makes to the US to pay for R&D; 5) the Commissioner{\textquoteright}s decision to impose a retroactive tax penalty on a foreign company that acted in accordance with the tax arrangements granted by its host country.",
author = "Morten Bennedsen and Brian Henry and Alexandra Roulette and Mark Stabile",
year = "2018",
month = may,
language = "English",
publisher = "INSEAD Publishing",
type = "Other",

}

RIS

TY - ICOMM

T1 - Did Apple Pay Too Little Tax?

T2 - Appealing the EU Ruling on Illegal State Aid

AU - Bennedsen, Morten

AU - Henry, Brian

AU - Roulette, Alexandra

AU - Stabile, Mark

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - On 30 August 2016, Margrethe Vestager, the European Commissioner for Competition, ordered Ireland to recover €13 billion in illegal state aid that the state had granted Apple over a decade from 2003. In allowing Apple to pay close to zero in taxes, she ruled, Ireland had given the foreign company a selective advantage over other businesses paying the regular corporate tax rate of 12.5%. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, and Enda Kenny, the Irish Prime Minister, appealed the ruling, a process that is still ongoing. The case explores this event from five analytical pillars: 1) the role of Ireland’s low corporate tax rate in attracting FDI; 2) Apple’s decision to allocate its earnings to a paper company in Ireland with no physical presence in the country; 3) the repatriation of foreign earnings to the United States; 4) the transfer payments that Apple makes to the US to pay for R&D; 5) the Commissioner’s decision to impose a retroactive tax penalty on a foreign company that acted in accordance with the tax arrangements granted by its host country.

AB - On 30 August 2016, Margrethe Vestager, the European Commissioner for Competition, ordered Ireland to recover €13 billion in illegal state aid that the state had granted Apple over a decade from 2003. In allowing Apple to pay close to zero in taxes, she ruled, Ireland had given the foreign company a selective advantage over other businesses paying the regular corporate tax rate of 12.5%. Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, and Enda Kenny, the Irish Prime Minister, appealed the ruling, a process that is still ongoing. The case explores this event from five analytical pillars: 1) the role of Ireland’s low corporate tax rate in attracting FDI; 2) Apple’s decision to allocate its earnings to a paper company in Ireland with no physical presence in the country; 3) the repatriation of foreign earnings to the United States; 4) the transfer payments that Apple makes to the US to pay for R&D; 5) the Commissioner’s decision to impose a retroactive tax penalty on a foreign company that acted in accordance with the tax arrangements granted by its host country.

M3 - Net publication - Internet publication

PB - INSEAD Publishing

ER -

ID: 224944605